The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry

被引:27
作者
Çetin, A [1 ]
Ertürk, H [1 ]
Çeliker, R [1 ]
Sivri, A [1 ]
Hasçelik, Z [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hacettepe, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
osteoporosis; bone mineral density; dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; quantitative ultrasound;
D O I
10.1007/PL00006857
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to establish whether quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters could identify patients classified as osteoporotic and ostcopenic on the basis of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). One hundred and twenty-three patients (39 male, 84 female) with osteoporosis and suspected of having osteoporosis were included ill this study. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) were measured and bone mineral densities (BMD of the lumbar spine and left hip a as measured by DEXA. Subjects were classified into three groups (normal, osteopenic and osteoporotic) on the basis of BMD T-scores measured by DEXA. QUS parameters of the osteoporotic: group were significantly lower than those of osteopenic and normal groups: there was no difference in QUS parameters between the normal and osteopenic groups Correlations of both right and left SOS and BUA with the spine and femoral neck BMD were moderate (r = 0.343-0.539, P < 0.001). There was also reasonable correlation between DEXA and QUS T-scores (r = 0.364-0.510, P < 0.001). QUS had a sensitivity of 21% : and a specificity Of 95% for diagnosing osteoporosis. We concluded that, although DEXA and QUS parameters were significantly correlated, QUS parameters can not predict osteopenia as defined by DEXA, and sensitivities: and specificities of QUS parameters were not sufficiently high for QUS to be used as: an alternative to DEXA.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 59
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Ultrasound velocity through the phalanges in normal and osteoporotic patients [J].
Blanckaert, F ;
Cortet, B ;
Coquerelle, P ;
Flipo, RM ;
Duquesnoy, B ;
Delcambre, B .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 64 (01) :28-33
[2]   Assessment of the relationship between broadband ultrasound attenuation and bone mineral density at the calcaneus using BUA imaging and DXA [J].
Chappard, C ;
Laugier, P ;
Fournier, B ;
Roux, C ;
Berger, G .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (04) :316-322
[3]   Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Cunningham, JL ;
Fordham, JN ;
Hewitt, TA ;
Speed, CA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (817) :25-32
[4]   3 QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND PARAMETERS REFLECT BONE-STRUCTURE [J].
GLUER, CC ;
WU, CY ;
JERGAS, M ;
GOLDSTEIN, SA ;
GENANT, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 55 (01) :46-52
[5]   How can we measure bone quality? [J].
Hans, D ;
Fuerst, T ;
Lang, T ;
Majumdar, S ;
Lu, Y ;
Genant, HK ;
Gluer, C .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 1997, 11 (03) :495-515
[6]   Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity [J].
Hans, D ;
Wu, C ;
Njeh, CF ;
Zhao, S ;
Augat, P ;
Newitt, D ;
Link, T ;
Lu, Y ;
Majumdar, S ;
Genant, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 64 (01) :18-23
[7]   Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study [J].
Hans, D ;
DargentMolina, P ;
Schott, AM ;
Sebert, JL ;
Cormier, C ;
Kotzki, PO ;
Delmas, PD ;
Pouilles, JM ;
Breart, G ;
Meunier, PJ .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9026) :511-514
[8]   THE ULTRASONIC ASSESSMENT OF OSTEOPENIA AS DEFINED BY DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
HERD, RJM ;
BLAKE, GM ;
MILLER, CG ;
PARKER, JC ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (799) :631-635
[9]   Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis [J].
Kanis, JA ;
Delmas, P ;
Burckhardt, P ;
Cooper, C ;
Torgerson, D .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (04) :390-406
[10]  
KAUFMAN JJ, 1993, J BONE MINER RES, V8, P517