Platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial

被引:288
作者
Georgoulias, V
Papadakis, E
Alexopoulos, A
Tsiafaki, X
Rapti, A
Veslemes, M
Palamidas, P
Vlachonikolis, I
机构
[1] Univ Gen Hosp Heraklion, Dept Med Oncol, Iraklion 71110, Crete, Greece
[2] Sotiria Gen Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis 1, Athens, Greece
[3] Sotiria Gen Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis 3, Athens, Greece
[4] Agios Savas Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol 1, Athens, Greece
[5] Sismanoglion Gen Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis 2, Athens, Greece
[6] Sismanoglion Gen Hosp, Dept Pulm Dis 3, Athens, Greece
[7] Univ Athens, Dept Pulm Dis, Sotiria Gen Hosp, GR-10679 Athens, Greece
[8] Univ Crete, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Iraklion, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04644-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Docetaxel in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine are active chemotherapy reigimes against non-small-cell lung cancer. We compared the efficacy and safety of a combination of cisplatin and docetaxel (group 1) with that of gemcitabine and docetaxel (group 2) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Methods Patients with stage IIIB or IV lung cancer who had not had prior chemotherapy were allocated either to group 1 and treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m2, day 1) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 2) or to group 2 and treated with gemcitabine (1100 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2, day 8). All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 mg/m2). All patients received recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 mg/m2) had appropriate standard premedication. Response and toxicity were assessed using WHO criteria. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings 441 patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel/cisplatin (group 1, n=219) or gemcitabine/docetaxel (group 2, n=222). 14 patients in group 1 and 21 patients in group 2 were not evaluable. Objective response rates were similar in the two groups: group 1, 32·4% (95% CI 26·2-38·6%; 1·4% complete response and 31% partial response); group 2, 30·2% (24·5-36·2%; 0·9% complete response and 29·3% partial response). The two groups did not differ in median duration of response, time to tumour progression, overall survival, or 1 year or 2 year survival rates. Interpretation Both drug combinations had comparable activity in patients with advanced cancer who had not previously had chemotherapy; however, gemcitabine and docetaxel had the most favourable toxicity profile. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1484
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ABBRATT RP, 1994, J CLIN ONCOL, V12, P1821
[2]   SURVIVAL DETERMINANTS IN EXTENSIVE-STAGE NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - THE SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP EXPERIENCE [J].
ALBAIN, KS ;
CROWLEY, JJ ;
LEBLANC, M ;
LIVINGSTON, RB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (09) :1618-1626
[3]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[4]  
Altman G. G, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
[6]   Phase II trial assessing the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [J].
Antón, A ;
Díaz-Fernández, N ;
Larriba, JG ;
Vadell, C ;
Masutti, B ;
Montalar, J ;
Barneto, I ;
Artal, A ;
Rosell, R .
LUNG CANCER, 1998, 22 (02) :139-148
[7]  
Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
[8]  
Collett D, 2014, MODELLING SURVIVAL D
[9]  
FEIGAL EG, 1993, SEMIN ONCOL, V20, P185
[10]   PHASE-II STUDY OF DOCETAXEL FOR RECURRENT OR METASTATIC NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER [J].
FOSSELLA, FV ;
LEE, JS ;
MURPHY, WK ;
LIPPMAN, SM ;
CALAYAG, M ;
PANG, A ;
CHASEN, M ;
SHIN, DM ;
GLISSON, B ;
BENNER, S ;
HUBER, M ;
PEREZSOLER, R ;
HONG, WK ;
RABER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (06) :1238-1244