An assessment of calibration and performance of the microdialysis system

被引:19
作者
Abrahamsson, P [1 ]
Winsö, O [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ Hosp, Dept Surg & Perioperat Sci, S-90185 Umea, Sweden
关键词
validation; calibration; no net flux; microdialysis; pig;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2005.04.036
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To improve the reliability of microdialysis measurements of tissue concentrations of metabolic substances, this study was designed to test both the performance and the internal validity of the microdialysis methods in the hands of our research group. The stability of the CMA 600 analyser was tested with a known glucose solution in 72 standard microvials and in 48 plastic vials. To evaluate if variation in sampling time makes any difference in sample concentration (recovery), sampling times of 10, 20 and 30 min were compared in vitro with a constant flow rate of 1 mu l/min. For testing of sampling times at different flow rates, an in vitro study was performed in which a constant sample volume of 10 mu l was obtained. With the no net flux method, the actual concentration of glucose and urea in subcutaneous tissue was measured. The CMA 600 glucose analysis function was accurate and stable with a coefficient of variability (CV) of 0.2-0.55%. There was no difference in recovery for the CMA 60 catheter for glucose when sampling times were varied. Higher flow rates resulted in decreased recovery. Subcutaneous tissue concentrations of glucose and urea were 4.4 mmol/l and 4.1 mmol/l, respectively. To conclude, this work describes an internal validation of our use of the microdialysis system by calibration of vials and catheters. Internal validation is necessary in order to be certain of adequate sampling times, flow rates and sampling volumes. With this in mind, the microdialysis technique is useful and appropriate for in vivo studies on tissue metabolism. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:730 / 734
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Validation of urea as an endogenous reference compound for the in vivo calibration of microdialysis probes [J].
Brunner, M ;
Joukhadar, C ;
Schmid, R ;
Erovic, B ;
Eichler, HG ;
Müller, M .
LIFE SCIENCES, 2000, 67 (08) :977-984
[2]  
Chaurasia CS, 1999, BIOMED CHROMATOGR, V13, P317, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0801(199908)13:5<317::AID-BMC891>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-I
[4]   Microdialysis update: optimizing the advantages [J].
Connelly, CA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1999, 514 (02) :303-303
[5]   Validation of a new calibration method for human muscle microdialysis at rest and during exercise [J].
Desvigne, N ;
Barthélémy, JC ;
Bertholon, F ;
Gay-Montchamp, JP ;
Freyssenet, D ;
Costes, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 92 (03) :312-320
[6]  
Ettinger SN, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P7964
[7]   Validation of a new intraarterial microdialysis shunt probe for the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters [J].
Höcht, C ;
Opezzo, JAW ;
Taira, CA .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 31 (06) :1109-1117
[8]   Validation of subcutaneous microdialysis sampling for pharmacokinetic studies of flurbiprofen in the rat [J].
Mathy, FX ;
Preat, V ;
Verbeeck, RK .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 90 (11) :1897-1906
[9]   Assessment of in vitro and in vivo recovery of gallamine using microdialysis [J].
Sasongko, L ;
Williams, KM ;
Ramzan, I ;
McLachlan, AJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 2000, 44 (03) :519-525
[10]  
Stahl M., 2002, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, V3, P165, DOI 10.2174/1389201023378373