Rule-based versus probabilistic approaches to the diagnosis of faults in wastewater treatment processes

被引:38
作者
Chong, HG
Walley, WJ
机构
[1] STAFFORDSHIRE UNIV,SCH COMP,STAFFORD ST18 0DG,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV ASTON,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,BIRMINGHAM B4 7ET,W MIDLANDS,ENGLAND
来源
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ENGINEERING | 1996年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
expert systems; uncertainty; diagnosis; wastewater treatment; rule-based systems; Bayesian belief networks; causal belief networks;
D O I
10.1016/0954-1810(96)00003-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 [模式识别与智能系统]; 0812 [计算机科学与技术]; 0835 [软件工程]; 1405 [智能科学与技术];
摘要
The need for computer-based diagnostic tools in wastewater management is outlined. Rule-based and probabilistic approaches to the development of diagnostic expert systems are critically reviewed, and it is demonstrated that the rule-based approach has serious limitations which make it unsuitable for diagnostic tasks under conditions of uncertainty. It is shown that Bayesian belief networks (BBNs), a probabilistic approach, has none of these limitations and is well-suited to diagnosis under uncertainty. The theory and application of BBNs are outlined and illustrated by a simple example based on a wastewater treatment plant. A brief case study is presented of the development of a full-scale BBN for the diagnosis of faults in a wastewater treatment plant. It is concluded that BBNs are far superior to rule-based systems in their ability to diagnose faults in complex systems like wastewater treatment processes, whose behaviour is inherently uncertain.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1993, REPRESENTING UNCERTA
[2]
Heckerman D., 1986, UNCERTAINTY ARTIFICI, V2
[3]
Heckerman D., 1986, UNCERTAINTY ARTIFICI
[4]
HECKERMAN D, MEMO KSL, V8625
[5]
LAURITZEN SL, 1988, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V50, P157
[6]
Neapolitan E, 1990, PROBABILISTIC REASON
[7]
Pearl, 1989, MORGAN KAUFMANN SERI, DOI DOI 10.1016/C2009-0-27609-4
[8]
*US GEN ACC OFF, 1982, 8243 CED US GAO