Playing the collaboration game right -: balancing trust and contracting

被引:182
作者
Blomqvist, K
Hurmelinna, P
Seppänen, R
机构
[1] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Telecom Business Res Ctr, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
[2] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, FIN-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
关键词
trust; contract; asymmetry; R&D; collaboration;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2004.09.001
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In today's knowledge-based global competitive climate, both large and small firms attempt to leverage external knowledge by collaborating with companies with complementary knowledge and resources. Academics and practitioners agree that in the global network era knowledge has become a key resource for continuous innovation and competitiveness. The issues of trust, social capital and the management of intellectual property have also attracted more attention in terms of knowledge creation. However, trust, intellectual property and contracts are seldom discussed simultaneously. This paper focuses on the roles of trust and contracts in asymmetric R&D collaboration. We begin by reviewing the state-of-the-art literature on these roles in interfirm collaboration, and continue by examining the potential for balancing trust and contracting in a case study in which a small firm collaborates with a large, global machinery and equipment supplier. We conclude that an understanding of the roles and dynamics of contracts and trust is critical for R&D collaboration. Contracts as such cannot guarantee successful collaboration, but the contracting process may be used purposefully to increase mutual understanding and learning, and to build up trust. We also offer some managerial recommendations on how to balance trust and contracting in asymmetric R&D collaboration. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, Markets and Hierarchies
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J EC BUSINESS
[3]  
ARROW K, 1974, LIMITS EC ORG
[4]   Choosing successful technology development partners: a best-practice model [J].
Bailey, WJ ;
Masson, R ;
Raeside, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 1998, 15 (1-2) :124-138
[5]   TRUSTWORTHINESS AS A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, JB ;
HANSEN, MH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1994, 15 :175-190
[6]  
BATENBURG R, 2000, 107 ISCORE
[7]   Filling a gap in traditional transaction cost economics:: Towards transaction benefits-based analysis [J].
Blomqvist, K ;
Kyläheiko, K ;
Virolainen, VM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 79 (01) :1-14
[8]  
BLOMQVIST K, 1999, 3 LAPP U TECHN TEL B
[9]  
BLOMQVIST K, 2002, THESIS ACTA U LAPPEE, V122
[10]  
BRADACH JL, 1991, COORDINATION SOCIAL, P277