Models of justice in the environmental debate

被引:63
作者
Clayton, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/0022-4537.00178
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Justice has become important in public and private consideration of the environment, but a number of different ways of operationalizing justice can be seen. Previous literature suggests that principles stressing responsibility and the public good are more common than need and equity in thinking about environmental issues. The results from two questionnaire studies, presented here, confirm that environmental justice-responsibility to other species and to future generations, and the rights of the environment-emerges as the most highly rated consideration in resolving environmental conflicts and that this factor is distinct from traditional procedural and distributive justice factors. Highlighting the individual or the collective makes different justice principles salient bur that the effect depends on one 's original position.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 474
页数:16
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV
[2]  
Berry Wendell., 1981, GIFT GOOD LAND
[3]  
Bullard Robert, 1990, Dumping in Dixie: Race. Class, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429495274
[4]   APPEALS TO JUSTICE IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEBATE [J].
CLAYTON, S .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1994, 50 (03) :13-27
[5]   Preference for macrojustice versus microjustice in environmental decisions [J].
Clayton, S .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (02) :162-183
[6]  
CLAYTON S, 1991, ANN M AM PSYCH ASS S
[7]  
CLAYTON S, 1996, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V9, P171
[8]   THE CONSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - A CASE-STUDY OF PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION IN LAND MANAGEMENT [J].
CVETKOVICH, G ;
EARLE, TC .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1994, 50 (03) :161-178
[9]  
DEAL C, 1993, GREENPEACE GUIDE ANT
[10]  
DUNLAP RE, 1984, SOC SCI QUART, V65, P1013