Intradermal delivery of vaccines: potential benefits and current challenges

被引:143
作者
Hickling, J. K. [2 ]
Jones, K. R. [2 ]
Friede, M. [3 ]
Zehrung, D. [1 ]
Chen, D. [1 ]
Kristensen, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Program Appropriate Technol Hlth PATH, Seattle, WA 98109 USA
[2] Working Tandem Ltd, Cambridge, England
[3] WHO, Dept Immunizat Vaccines & Biol, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
INACTIVATED POLIOVIRUS VACCINE; INFLUENZA VACCINE; ANKARA ACAM3000; IMMUNOGENICITY; SAFETY; ROUTE; SYSTEMS; SINGLE; COST;
D O I
10.2471/BLT.10.079426
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
100235 [预防医学];
摘要
Delivery of vaccine antigens to the dermis and/or epidermis of human skin (i.e. intradermal delivery) might be more efficient than injection into the muscle or subcutaneous tissue, thereby reducing the volumes of antigen. This is known as dose-sparing and has been demonstrated in clinical trials with some, but not all, vaccines. Dose-sparing could be beneficial to immunization programmes by potentially reducing the costs of purchase, distribution and storage of vaccines; increasing vaccine availability and effectiveness. The data obtained with intradermal delivery of some vaccines are encouraging and warrant further study and development; however significant gaps in knowledge and operational challenges such as reformulation, optimizing vaccine presentation and development of novel devices to aid intradermal vaccine delivery need to be addressed. Modelling of the costs and potential savings resulting from intradermal delivery should be done to provide realistic expectations of the potential benefits and to support cases for investment. Implementation and uptake of intradermal vaccine delivery requires further research and development, which depends upon collaboration between multiple stakeholders in the field of vaccination.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 226
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
Preclinical evaluation of microneedle technology for intradermal delivery of influenza vaccines [J].
Alarcon, Jason B. ;
Hartley, Andrea Waterston ;
Harvey, Noel G. ;
Mikszta, John A. .
CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2007, 14 (04) :375-381
[2]
[Anonymous], 2007, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V82, P425
[3]
[Anonymous], 2008, Wkly Epidemiol Rec, V83, P388
[4]
[Anonymous], 2010, IMPROVING AFFORDABIL
[5]
[Anonymous], 2010, YELLOW FEVER INITIAT
[6]
[Anonymous], 2001, REPORT M PRIORITIES
[7]
[Anonymous], 2000, USE OPENED MULTIDOSE
[8]
[Anonymous], 2009, INTRADERMAL DELIVERY
[9]
Immunogenicity, large scale safety and lot consistency of an intradermal influenza vaccine in adults aged 18-60 years Randomized, controlled, phase III trial [J].
Arnou, Robert ;
Eavis, Patrick ;
De Juanes Pardo, Jose-Ramon ;
Ambrozaitis, Arvydas ;
Kazek, Marie-Pierre ;
Weber, Francoise .
HUMAN VACCINES, 2010, 6 (04) :346-354
[10]
Intradermal influenza vaccine for older adults: A randomized controlled multicenter phase III study [J].
Arnou, Robert ;
Icardi, Giancarlo ;
De Decker, Marijke ;
Ambrozaitis, Arvydas ;
Kazek, Marie-Pierre ;
Weber, Francoise ;
Van Damme, Pierre .
VACCINE, 2009, 27 (52) :7304-7312