Sagittal plane analysis of head, neck, and trunk kinematics and electromyographic activity during locomotion

被引:82
作者
Cromwell, RL
Aadland-Monahan, TK
Nelson, AT
Stern-Sylvestre, SM
Seder, B
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Dept Phys Therapy, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Camden Cty Visiting Nurses Assoc, Cherry Hill, NJ USA
[3] Mid Amer Ctr Orthopaed & Sports Med, St Charles, IL USA
[4] Visiting Nurses Assoc Cape Cod, Centerville, MA USA
[5] Mark J Rosen Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
angular motion; balance; muscle activity; stability; walking;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2001.31.5.255
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Descriptive study examining kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) patterns of the upper body during walking. Objective: To examine trunk, neck, and head movements to determine a mechanism for upper body stabilization during walking. Background: Dynamic balance of the upper body during walking provides a stable base for function of sensory systems. Prior investigations of upper body motion during walking were limited to examination of isolated segments, or examination of the upper body as a single unit. In our study, the upper body is examined as 3 segments: the trunk, neck, and head. Methods and Measures: Sagittal plane walking patterns were examined in 8 unimpaired young adults. Markers placed on the trunk, neck, and head segments were recorded on videotape. Angles were calculated with respect to an external horizontal reference to determine segment position relative to space. EMG measures were obtained from erector spinae, rectus abdominus, semispinalis capitis, and sternocleidomastoid muscles. Results: Results showed dynamic stability was accomplished through maintenance of a posture where the trunk was flexed, the neck was extended and the head was flexed. The trunk segment demonstrated greatest stability with the neck being the least stable of the :I segments. Movements of upper body segments showed a tendency for the head and neck: to move opposite to the trunk. EMG data demonstrated erector spinae muscle activity occurring near heel contact of each limb followed by trunk extension. The remaining muscles exhibited variable patterns of activity. Conclusions: These data indicate that movements of the upper body help to maintain a posture that promotes stability of these segments during walking. The trunk was the most stable of the three segments thereby, providing a stable platform for head and neck movement. Erector spinae muscle activity contributed to upper body movements by extending the trunk to maintain balance at heel contact. These results provide a basis for studying changes in dynamic stability that occur with ape.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 262
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BERTHOZ A, 1988, INT CONGR SER, V812, P189
[2]  
Clauser C.E., 1969, WEIGHT VOLUME CTR MA
[3]   LOADS ON THE LUMBAR TRUNK DURING LEVEL WALKING [J].
CROMWELL, R ;
SCHULTZ, AB ;
BECK, R ;
WARWICK, D .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1989, 7 (03) :371-377
[4]  
Cromwell R. L., 1995, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V21, P2085
[5]   Horizontal plane head stabilization during locomotor tasks [J].
Cromwell, RL ;
Newton, RA ;
Carlton, LG .
JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2001, 33 (01) :49-58
[6]  
Hinrichs Richard N, 1990, Multiple muscle systems: biomechanics and movement organization, P694, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4613-9030-5_45, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-9030-5_45]
[7]   MECHANISMS OF HEAD STABILIZATION DURING RANDOM ROTATIONS IN THE PITCH PLANE [J].
KESHNER, EA ;
CROMWELL, RL ;
ROVAI, G ;
PETERSON, BW .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1992, 656 :937-939
[8]   MECHANISMS CONTROLLING HUMAN HEAD STABILIZATION .1. HEAD-NECK DYNAMICS DURING RANDOM ROTATIONS IN THE HORIZONTAL PLANE [J].
KESHNER, EA ;
PETERSON, BW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 73 (06) :2293-2301
[9]  
KESHNER EA, 1989, EXP BRAIN RES, V75, P335
[10]   MECHANISMS CONTROLLING HUMAN HEAD STABILIZATION .2. HEAD-NECK CHARACTERISTICS DURING RANDOM ROTATIONS IN THE VERTICAL PLANE [J].
KESHNER, EA ;
CROMWELL, RL ;
PETERSON, BW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 73 (06) :2302-2312