Self-administered Expanded Disability Status Scale with functional system scores correlates well with a physician-administered test

被引:82
作者
Bowen, J
Gibbons, L
Gianas, A
Kraft, GH
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Environm Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS | 2001年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
multiple sclerosis; expended disability status scale; disability; self assessment; outcome; questionnaire;
D O I
10.1191/135245801678438447
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Patient-administered measures ore needed to assess disability cost-effectively in large epidemiological studies. Setting: An outpatient clinic in a forge multiple sclerosis center. Methods: A self-administered EDSS questionnaire was developed (EDSS-S). Consecutive patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis completed the EDSS-S (n=95). During the some visit, a physician completed on EDSS (EDSS-P). Scores below 4.0 were determined using functional system (FS) scores. Scores above 4.0 were calculated by two methods, using gait alone and using gait and functional system scores combined. Results: EDSS-P scores ranged from 0-9.5 (mean 5.1, median 5.0, 78% female. age 17-78, mean age 45). Mean EDSS-P, EDSS-S and intraclass correlation coefficients of agreement were: EDSS using ambulation alone (4.6, 5.1, 0.89), EDSS using ambulation and FS scores (4.6, 5.3, 0.87), bowel/bladder FS scores (1.6, 1.7 0.79), pyramidal FS scores (2.1, 2.4, 0.67), sensory FS scores (1.6, 2.1, 0.60), cerebellar FS scores (1.1, 1.6, 0.55), brainstem FS scores (0.5, 1.2, 0.45), vision FS scores (1.9, 1.3, 0.38), cerebral FS scores (0.6, 2.3, 0.27). Conclusions: Very good correlation was seen between patient and physician scores for EDSS and the bowel/bladder FS score. Four other FS scores correlated moderately. In general, patients scored themselves more disabled than physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 206
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   INTERRATER RELIABILITY IN ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL-SYSTEMS AND DISABILITY ON THE KURTZKE SCALE IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
AMATO, MP ;
FRATIGLIONI, L ;
GROPPI, C ;
SIRACUSA, G ;
AMADUCCI, L .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1988, 45 (07) :746-748
[2]  
Cheng EM, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V52, pA131
[3]   A questionnaire to assess neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis [J].
Goodin, DS .
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 1998, 4 (05) :444-451
[4]   INTENSIVE IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - A RANDOMIZED, 3-ARM STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, PLASMA-EXCHANGE, AND ACTH [J].
HAUSER, SL ;
DAWSON, DM ;
LEHRICH, JR ;
BEAL, MF ;
KEVY, SV ;
PROPPER, RD ;
MILLS, JA ;
WEINER, HL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (04) :173-180
[5]  
HERNDON R, 1997, HDB NEUROLOGIC RATIN, P107
[6]   Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition [J].
Hobart, J ;
Freeman, J ;
Thompson, A .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :1027-1040
[7]   DISEASE STEPS IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - A SIMPLE APPROACH TO EVALUATE DISEASE PROGRESSION [J].
HOHOL, MJ ;
ORAV, EJ ;
WEINER, HL .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (02) :251-255
[8]  
KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
[9]   A NEW SCALE FOR EVALUATING DISABILITY IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS [J].
KURTZKE, JF .
NEUROLOGY, 1955, 5 (08) :580-583
[10]  
Lechner-Scott J, 1997, J NEUROL S3, V244, pS25