Evaluation of two-test serodiagnostic method for early Lyme disease in clinical practice

被引:40
作者
Trevejo, RT
Krause, PJ
Sikand, VK
Schriefer, ME
Ryan, R
Lepore, T
Porter, W
Dennis, DT
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Bacterial Zoonoses Branch, Div Vectorborne Infect Dis, Natl Ctr Infect Dis, Ft Collins, CO USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Farmington, CT 06032 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/314663
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a two-test approach for the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease (LD), with EIA testing followed by Western immunoblotting (WB) of EIA-equivocal and -positive specimens, This approach was compared with a simplified two-test approach (WB of ELA equivocals only) and WE alone for early LD, Case-patients with erythema migrans (EM) rash greater than or equal to 5 cm were recruited from three primary-care practices in LD-endemic areas to provide acute- (S1) and convalescent-phase serum specimens (S2), The simplified approach had the highest sensitivity when either S1 or S2 samples were tested, nearly doubling when S2 were tested, while decreasing slightly for the other two approaches. Accordingly, the simplified approach had the lowest negative likelihood ratio for either S1 or S2. For early LD with EM, the simplified approach performed well and was less costly than the other testing approaches since less WE is required.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 938
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
AgueroRosenfeld ME, 1996, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V34, P1
[2]   SERODIAGNOSIS IN EARLY LYME-DISEASE [J].
AGUEROROSENFELD, ME ;
NOWAKOWSKI, J ;
MCKENNA, DF ;
CARBONARO, CA ;
WORMSER, GP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1993, 31 (12) :3090-3095
[3]  
Association of State and Territorial Public Health Laboratory Directors US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Michigan Department of Health, 1994, P 2 NAT C SER DIAGN, P1
[4]   PERFORMANCE OF 45 LABORATORIES PARTICIPATING IN A PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM FOR LYME-DISEASE SEROLOGY [J].
BAKKEN, LL ;
CASE, KL ;
CALLISTER, SM ;
BOURDEAU, NJ ;
SCHELL, RF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (07) :891-895
[5]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES OF PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED EARLY LYME-DISEASE, MISSOURI, 1990-1993 [J].
CAMPBELL, GL ;
PAUL, WS ;
SCHRIEFER, ME ;
CRAVEN, RB ;
ROBBINS, KE ;
DENNIS, DT .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 172 (02) :470-480
[6]  
*CDC, 1995, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V44, P590
[7]  
*CDCP, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P20
[8]  
*CDCP, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P531
[9]   ANTIGENS OF BORRELIA-BURGDORFERI RECOGNIZED DURING LYME-DISEASE - APPEARANCE OF A NEW IMMUNOGLOBULIN-M RESPONSE AND EXPANSION OF THE IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G RESPONSE LATE IN THE ILLNESS [J].
CRAFT, JE ;
FISCHER, DK ;
SHIMAMOTO, GT ;
STEERE, AC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1986, 78 (04) :934-939
[10]   Improved serodiagnostic testing for lyme disease: Results of a multicenter serologic evaluation [J].
Craven, RB ;
Quan, TJ ;
Bailey, RE ;
Dattwyler, R ;
Ryan, RW ;
Sigal, LH ;
Steere, AC ;
Sullivan, B ;
Johnson, BJB ;
Dennis, DT ;
Gubler, DJ .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 2 (02) :136-140