The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of four AT1-receptor blockers.: Differences in potency and efficacy

被引:45
作者
Elmfeldt, D [1 ]
Olofsson, B
Meredith, P
机构
[1] AstraZeneca R&D, Clin Sci, SE-43183 Molndal, Sweden
[2] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Dept Med & Therapeut, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
AT(1)-receptor blockers; dose-response; hypertension; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1080/080370502320779502
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100210 [外科学];
摘要
The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of the first four available AT(1)-receptor blockers, i.e. losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, were assessed based on data obtained from the FDA's evaluation reports of the respective New Drug Application files. All available randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in adult men and women with mild to moderate primary diastolic hypertension were included, provided that the reduction in trough (24 h post-dose) supine or sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) had been assessed using the intention-to-treat approach. All studies had an initial single-blind placebo run-in period followed by at least 4 weeks double-blind treatment. The selected studies were included in a meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship for each drug. The dose-response relationship was estimated by fitting the placebo-adjusted, weighted mean reductions in DBP for each dose of the drug to an E-max model. The E-max (maximal effect at an infinitely large dose) for the reduction in DBP, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in brackets, were found to be 5.6 (3.6-7.5) mmHg for losartan, 5.8 (5.0-6.6) mmHg for valsartan, 6.9 (5.9-7.9) mmHg for irbesartan and 7.5 (6.1-8.9) mmHg for candesartan (p = 0.014, candesartan vs valsartan). In conclusion, this investigation demonstrates that candesartan can reduce DBP significantly more than valsartan, and is supportive of previous head-to-head comparisons, which have proven candesartan to have a greater antihypertensive effect than losartan at recommended doses. Thus, differences in efficacy between different AT(1)-receptor blockers do exist, and should have implications for the choice of AT(1)-receptor blocker when treating patients with hypertension, considering the importance of good blood pressure control.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 301
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
Andersson Ove K., 1998, Blood Pressure, V7, P53
[2]
[Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI [10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005, DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005]
[3]
*ASS BLACK CARD, 2000, HEART DIS, V2, P392
[4]
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interactions of candesartan cilexetil and losartan [J].
Azizi, M ;
Chatellier, G ;
Guyene, TT ;
Ménard, J .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 17 (04) :561-568
[5]
Bakris G, 2001, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V3, P16, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00826.x
[6]
Belcher G, 1997, J HUM HYPERTENS, V11, pS85
[7]
BELZ GG, 2000, JRAAS, V1, P226
[8]
Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy [J].
Bloom, BS .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 20 (04) :671-681
[9]
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Burnier, M ;
Brunner, HR .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9204) :637-645
[10]
Chalmers J, 1999, J HYPERTENS, V17, P151