Ileostomy formation does not prolong hospital length of stay after open anterior resection when performed within an enhanced recovery programme

被引:19
作者
Hignett, S. [1 ]
Parmar, C. D. [1 ]
Lewis, W. [1 ]
Makin, C. A. [1 ]
Walsh, C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wirral NHS Trust, Colorectal Dept, Wirral, Merseyside, England
关键词
Anterior resection; enhanced recovery programme (ERP); ileostomy; length of stay; DEFUNCTIONING STOMA; COLORECTAL-CANCER; OPEN SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; REHABILITATION; PATHWAY; RECTUM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02381.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Aim Previous studies have implicated stoma formation as an independent factor prolonging length of stay (LOS) after colorectal surgery. We examined whether loop ileostomy (LI) formation during an open anterior resection affected LOS within a newly developed enhanced recovery programme (ERP). This involved reorganization of services, including stoma care, to optimize pre- and perioperative patient education, training and expectation, while applying the standard scientific principles of enhanced recovery. Method Data were collected prospectively on 72 consecutive open anterior resections (33 with LI) to see whether LI affected LOS. Stomas were fashioned at the surgeon's discretion and patients were discharged according to agreed criteria. Results Thirty-three of the 72 patients had a covering LI performed. The overall age range was 32-85 years (median 68), with 40 patients being men. LOS for all 72 patients ranged from 3 to 34 days. The median and mean LOS were the same for both groups (median 6 days, mean 8 days). The complication rate was 44% (32/72) with a leak rate of 7% (5/72) and a mortality of 1.4% (1/72). Between the two groups (no ileostomy vs ileostomy), there was no statistically significant difference in complications (41% vs 48%), leakage (8% vs 6%) and readmission rates (12% vs 5%). Conclusion A covering loop ileostomy need not prolong hospital stay after open anterior resection.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1183
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care [J].
Basse, L ;
Thorbol, JE ;
Lossl, K ;
Kehlet, H .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (03) :271-277
[2]
A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection [J].
Basse, L ;
Jakobsen, DH ;
Billesbolle, P ;
Werner, M ;
Kehlet, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (01) :51-57
[3]
Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition [J].
Basse, L ;
Raskov, HH ;
Jakobsen, DH ;
Sonne, E ;
Billesbolle, P ;
Hendel, HW ;
Rosenberg, J ;
Kehlet, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (04) :446-453
[4]
BILLYARD J, 2007, GASTROINTESTINAL NUR, V5, P32
[5]
A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection [J].
Cartmell, Mark T. ;
Jones, Oliver M. ;
Moran, B. J. ;
Cecil, T. D. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (12) :2643-2647
[6]
Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education:: A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Chaudhri, S ;
Brown, L ;
Hassan, I ;
Horgan, AF .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (03) :504-509
[7]
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection [J].
Delaney, CP ;
Zutshi, M ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Remzi, FH ;
Hammel, J ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (07) :851-859
[8]
FAIZ O, 2007, COLORECTAL DIS
[9]
PROTECTIVE COLOSTOMY IN LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM USING THE EEA STAPLING INSTRUMENT - A RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
GRAFFNER, H ;
FREDLUND, P ;
OLSSON, SA ;
OSCARSON, J ;
PETERSSON, BG .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1983, 26 (02) :87-90
[10]
Determinants of outcome after colorectal resection within an enhanced recovery programme [J].
Hendry, P. O. ;
Hansel, J. ;
Nygren, J. ;
Lassen, K. ;
Dejong, C. H. C. ;
Ljungqvist, O. ;
Fearon, K. C. H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (02) :197-205