An evaluation of β-turn prediction methods

被引:43
作者
Kaur, H [1 ]
Raghava, GPS [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Microbial Technol, Chandigarh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1508
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: beta-turn is an important element of protein structure. In the past three decades, numerous beta-turn prediction methods have been developed based on various strategies. For a detailed discussion about the importance of beta-turns and a systematic introduction of the existing prediction algorithms for beta-turns and their types, please see a recent review (Chou, Analytical Biochemistry, 286, 1-16, 2000). However at present, it is still difficult to say which method is better than the other. This is because of the fact that these methods were developed on different sets of data. Thus, it is important to evaluate the performance of beta-turn prediction methods. Results: We have evaluated the performance of six methods of beta-turn prediction. All the methods have been tested on a set of 426 non-homologous protein chains. It has been observed that the performance of the neural network based method, BTPRED, is significantly better than the statistical methods. One of the reasons for its better performance is that it utilizes the predicted secondary structure information. We have also trained, tested and evaluated the performance of all methods except BTPRED and GORBTURN, on new data set using a 7-fold cross-validation technique. There is a significant improvement in performance of all the methods when secondary structure information is incorporated. Moreover, after incorporating secondary structure information, the Sequence Coupled Model has yielded better results in predicting beta-turns as compared with other methods. In this study, both threshold dependent and independent (ROC) measures have been used for evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1514
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Chou KC, 1997, J PEPT RES, V49, P120
[2]   Classification and prediction of beta-turn types [J].
Chou, KC ;
Blinn, JR .
JOURNAL OF PROTEIN CHEMISTRY, 1997, 16 (06) :575-595
[3]   PREDICTION OF PROTEIN STRUCTURAL CLASSES [J].
CHOU, KC ;
ZHANG, CT .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1995, 30 (04) :275-349
[4]   Prediction of tight turns and their types in proteins [J].
Chou, KC .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 286 (01) :1-16
[5]  
CHOU PY, 1979, BIOPHYS J, V26, P367, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85259-5
[6]   PREDICTION OF PROTEIN CONFORMATION [J].
CHOU, PY ;
FASMAN, GD .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1974, 13 (02) :222-245
[7]  
DELEO JM, 1993, P 2 INT S UNC MOD AN, P318
[8]   FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS OF PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE PREDICTION USING INFORMATION-THEORY - NEW PARAMETERS AND CONSIDERATION OF RESIDUE PAIRS [J].
GIBRAT, JF ;
GARNIER, J ;
ROBSON, B .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1987, 198 (03) :425-443
[9]   β- and γ-turns in proteins revisited:: A new set of amino acid turn-type dependent positional preferences and potentials [J].
Guruprasad, K ;
Rajkumar, S .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2000, 25 (02) :143-156
[10]  
Hutchinson EG, 1996, PROTEIN SCI, V5, P212