Relative survival in elderly cancer patients in Europe

被引:54
作者
Vercelli, M [1 ]
Quaglia, A
Casella, C
Parodi, S
Capocaccia, R
Garcia, CM
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, Dept Clin & Expt Oncol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Natl Canc Inst, Canc Registry Sect, Genoa, Italy
[3] Ist Super Sanita, Epidemiol & Biostat Lab, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[4] Escuela Andaluza Salud Publ, Granada, Spain
关键词
relative survival rates; elderly patients; cancer; Europe;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00325-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this paper different patterns of survival by age and gender are presented for 17 European countries which participated in the EUROCARE II programme. Survival data were available for 701 521 patients aged between 65 and 99 years from 44 population-based cancer registries. Age-standardised relative survival rates at 1 and 5 years from diagnosis were computed. Relative risks (RRs) of death for those aged between 65 and 99 years compared with those aged between 55 and 64 years were estimated by gender and country. In general, the elderly had a large survival disadvantage, particularly 1 year after diagnosis and in women. Poorer survival rates in the elderly were observed for patients from Eastern European countries for almost all sites. However, relative survival of the elderly with respect to younger patients was similar in the different geographic areas. The results are in agreement with other population-based studies, confirming a worse prognosis for the elderly in both sexes. This may be explained by changes in biology and the natural history of the tumour and the occurrence of severe comorbidities, potentially affecting preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. The lack of equality in providing adequate treatment to elderly cancer patients should be addressed as a matter of urgency by health-care providers. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2264 / 2270
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
BERRINO F, 1995, IARC SCI PUBL, V132, P447
[2]  
Busch E, 1996, CANCER, V78, P101, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<101::AID-CNCR15>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-G
[4]  
*CEC, 1997, EU POP 2050 GIRLS CO
[5]   DETERMINANTS OF NON-ATTENDANCE TO MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING - ANALYSIS OF A POPULATION-SAMPLE OF THE SCREENING-PROGRAM IN THE DISTRICT OF FLORENCE [J].
CIATTO, S ;
CECCHINI, S ;
ISU, A ;
MAGGI, A ;
CAMMELLI, S .
TUMORI, 1992, 78 (01) :22-25
[6]  
COEBERGH JWW, 1995, IARC SCI PUBL, V132, P447
[7]  
COHEN HJ, 1994, CANCER, V74, P2092, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2092::AID-CNCR2820741717>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-G
[9]  
COSTANZA ME, 1994, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V74, P2046, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2046::AID-CNCR2820741710>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-U