Randomised trial of two pharmacological methods of bowel preparation for day case colonoscopy

被引:26
作者
Pinfield, A [1 ]
Stringer, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Paediat Surg, Leeds LS2 9NS, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
colonoscopy; bowel preparation; randomised trial;
D O I
10.1136/adc.80.2.181
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 [儿科学];
摘要
Aims-To undertake a prospective, single blind, randomised trial comparing the efficacy and tolerance of two outpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation regimens. Methods-Patients aged between 18 months and 16 years being admitted for day case colonoscopy were allocated randomly to receive either Picolax (an oral, sugar free powder containing sodium picosulphate 10 mg/sachet with magnesium citrate) and clear fluids or bisacodyl tablets with an unrestricted diet and a phosphate enema just before colonoscopy. Patient compliance, bowel frequency, and associated symptoms were recorded, and the adequacy of the bowel preparation was assessed in a blinded manner. Results-63 of 66 patients completed the trial. Mean age, mean weight, extent of colonoscopy, and distribution of underlying pathology were similar in both groups. Bowel preparation was good or excellent in all of the patients in the Picolax group (n = 32) compared with 22 patients in the bisacodyl/phosphate enema group (n = 31). The latter group experienced more abdominal discomfort during bowel preparation but three of the Picolax group vomited and the lack of solid food distressed some children. Conclusions-All bowel preparation methods have limitations and unpleasant side effects but the use of Picolax and clear fluids proved superior to bisacodyl tablets and a phosphate enema in children undergoing day case colonoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 183
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
PREPARING THE BOWEL FOR COLONOSCOPY [J].
ABUBAKAR, K ;
GOGGIN, N ;
GORMALLY, S ;
DURNIN, M ;
DRUMM, B .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1995, 73 (05) :459-461
[2]
Barrish J O, 1993, Gastroenterol Nurs, V16, P106, DOI 10.1097/00001610-199312000-00004
[3]
Colonoscopy preparation in children: Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods [J].
daSilva, MM ;
Briars, GL ;
Patrick, MK ;
Cleghorn, GJ ;
Shepherd, RW .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1997, 24 (01) :33-37
[4]
SAFETY OF PICOLAX IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE [J].
EVANS, M ;
WALKERSMITH, J ;
WILLIAMS, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 299 (6707) :1101-1102
[5]
Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children [J].
Gremse, DA ;
Sacks, AI ;
Raines, S .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1996, 23 (05) :586-590
[6]
SUCCESSFUL PANCOLONOSCOPY AND ILEOSCOPY IN CHILDREN [J].
ISRAEL, DM ;
MCLAIN, BI ;
HASSALL, E .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1994, 19 (03) :283-289
[7]
MILLA PJ, 1995, PEDIAT SURG, P522
[8]
SAFETY, EFFICACY, AND TOLERANCE OF INTESTINAL LAVAGE IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING DIAGNOSTIC COLONOSCOPY [J].
SONDHEIMER, JM ;
SOKOL, RJ ;
TAYLOR, SF ;
SILVERMAN, A ;
ZELASNEY, B .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1991, 119 (01) :148-152
[9]
TOLIA V, 1984, J PEDIAT GASTROENTER, V3, P486
[10]
Trautwein A L, 1996, Gastroenterol Nurs, V19, P137, DOI 10.1097/00001610-199607000-00004