Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Effect on PSA, Gleason sum, and risk of recurrence

被引:15
作者
Shibata, A
Mohanasundaram, UM
Terris, MK
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, Urol Sect, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.069
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. To determine whether the change in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), change in Gleason sum, and/or interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy have an association with biochemical recurrence. Methods. The relationship between biochemical recurrence and the interval between biopsy and surgery, as well as the rate and amount of change in PSA and Gleason sum from biopsy to surgery, was evaluated in 151 patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. Results. A statistically significant increase was found in PSA level and Gleason sum between biopsy and surgery (P = 0.01 and P <0.0001, respectively). No significant association was found between prebiopsy PSA level (P = 0.27) or biopsy Gleason sum (P = 0.07) with biochemical recurrence as independent variables or in a combined model (P = 0.12). An association was also not found between recurrence and preprostatectomy PSA level (P = 0.15) or the rate of PSA change (P = 0.28) as independent variables. However, a significant association was found with the prostatectomy Gleason sum (P = 0.001). In a combined model, a significant association was noted between the preprostatectomy PSA level and prostatectomy specimen Gleason sum and biochemical recurrence (P = 0.003). No increased risk of biochemical recurrence was noted with increasing time from biopsy to prostatectomy (odds ratio 1.00) or the rate (odds ratio 1.03) and degree (odds ratio 1.30) of serum PSA or Gleason sum (odds ratio 1.07). Conclusions. The interval between biopsy and radical prostatectomy is not a predictor of biochemical failure. An association was noted between an increased risk of biochemical failure and the amount of serum PSA and Gleason sum increase between biopsy and surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 813
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression [J].
Choo, R ;
Klotz, L ;
Danjoux, C ;
Morton, GC ;
DeBoer, G ;
Szumacher, E ;
Fleshner, N ;
Bunting, P ;
Hruby, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1664-1669
[2]
Predicting prostate specific antigen outcome preoperatively in the prostate specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Weinstein, M ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Schultz, D ;
Rhude, M ;
Rocha, S ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2185-2188
[3]
Serial prostate specific antigen, free-to-total prostate specific antigen ratio and complexed prostate specific antigen for the diagnosis of prostate cancer [J].
Ellis, WJ ;
Etzioni, R ;
Vessella, RL ;
Hu, CC ;
Goodman, GE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :93-98
[4]
Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1C disease [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC ;
Carter, HB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1688-1691
[5]
Preoperative PSA velocity and doubling time do not predict adverse pathologic features or biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (03) :476-480
[6]
THE ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC-BIOPSY SPECIMENS IN PREDICTING TUMOR GRADES BY GLEASON CLASSIFICATION OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS [J].
GARNETT, JE ;
OYASU, R ;
GRAYHACK, JT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 131 (04) :690-693
[7]
A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Eastham, JA ;
Stapleton, AMF ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (10) :766-771
[8]
MILLS SE, 1986, CANCER, V57, P346, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860115)57:2<346::AID-CNCR2820570226>3.0.CO
[9]
2-E
[10]
Nam Robert K, 2003, Can J Urol, V10, P1891