The relative importance of seed competition, resource competition and perturbations on community structure

被引:16
作者
Bohn, K. [1 ,2 ]
Dyke, J. G. [1 ]
Pavlick, R. [1 ,3 ]
Reineking, B. [2 ]
Reu, B. [1 ,4 ]
Kleidon, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, D-07701 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Bayreuth, BayCEER, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[3] Int Max Planck Res Sch Earth Syst Modelling, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Bonn, Inst Geog, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
关键词
VEGETATION DYNAMICS; BIOSPHERE MODEL; PLANT GEOGRAPHY; TRAIT RESPONSES; CONSTRAINTS; DISTURBANCE; MORTALITY; AVAILABILITY; BIODIVERSITY; COEXISTENCE;
D O I
10.5194/bg-8-1107-2011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
While the regional climate is the primary selection pressure for whether a plant strategy can survive, however, competitive interactions strongly affect the relative abundances of plant strategies within communities. Here, we investigate the relative importance of competition and perturbations on the development of vegetation community structure. To do so, we develop DIVE (Dynamics and Interactions of VEgetation), a simple general model that links plant strategies to their competitive dynamics, using growth and reproduction characteristics that emerge from climatic constraints. The model calculates population dynamics based on establishment, mortality, invasion and exclusion in the presence of different strengths of perturbations, seed and resource competition. The highest levels of diversity were found in simulations without competition as long as mortality is not too high. However, reasonable successional dynamics were only achieved when resource competition is considered. Under high levels of competition, intermediate levels of perturbations were required to obtain coexistence. Since succession and coexistence are observed in plant communities, we conclude that the DIVE model with competition and intermediate levels of perturbation represents an adequate way to model population dynamics. Because of the simplicity and generality of DIVE, it could be used to understand vegetation structure and functioning at the global scale and the response of vegetation to global change.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1120
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect [J].
Angert, Amy L. ;
Huxman, Travis E. ;
Chesson, Peter ;
Venable, D. Lawrence .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (28) :11641-11645
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Description of the "TRIFFID"dynamic global vegetation model
[3]  
Arora VK, 2006, EARTH INTERACT, V10
[4]   Tree species composition in European pristine forests:: Comparison of stand data to model predictions [J].
Badeck, FW ;
Lischke, H ;
Bugmann, H ;
Hickler, T ;
Hönninger, K ;
Lasch, P ;
Lexer, MJ ;
Mouillot, F ;
Schaber, J ;
Smith, B .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2001, 51 (3-4) :307-347
[5]   COMPETITION AND COEXISTENCE IN PLANT-COMMUNITIES [J].
BENGTSSON, J ;
FAGERSTROM, T ;
RYDIN, H .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (07) :246-250
[6]   PREDICTING PHYSIOGNOMIC VEGETATION TYPES WITH CLIMATE VARIABLES [J].
BOX, EO .
VEGETATIO, 1981, 45 (02) :127-139
[7]  
Brown JH, 2004, ECOLOGY, V85, P1771, DOI 10.1890/03-9000
[8]   A review of forest gap models [J].
Bugmann, H .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2001, 51 (3-4) :259-305
[9]   Species loss and aboveground carbon storage in a tropical forest [J].
Bunker, DE ;
DeClerck, F ;
Bradford, JC ;
Colwell, RK ;
Perfecto, I ;
Phillips, OL ;
Sankaran, M ;
Naeem, S .
SCIENCE, 2005, 310 (5750) :1029-1031
[10]   Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress [J].
Callaway, RM ;
Brooker, RW ;
Choler, P ;
Kikvidze, Z ;
Lortie, CJ ;
Michalet, R ;
Paolini, L ;
Pugnaire, FI ;
Newingham, B ;
Aschehoug, ET ;
Armas, C ;
Kikodze, D ;
Cook, BJ .
NATURE, 2002, 417 (6891) :844-848