Haecceity: Laying Out a Plane for Post Qualitative Inquiry

被引：46

作者：

St Pierre, Elizabeth Adams ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Georgia, Crit Studies, Educ Theory & Practice Dept, 604E Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA

[2] Univ Georgia, Interdisciplinary Qualitat Res Program, 604E Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA

[3] Univ Georgia, Inst Womens Studies, 604E Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602 USA

来源：

QUALITATIVE INQUIRY | 2017年 / 23卷 / 09期

关键词：

concept; haecceity; Deleuze; post qualitative; ontology; DELEUZE;

D O I：

10.1177/1077800417727764

中图分类号：

C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

This article traces 25 years of scholarship that used the concept haecceity to slowly deconstruct or deterritorialize conventional qualitative methodology and think post qualitative inquiry, which might help lay out a plane of inquiry that will enable new concepts and practices such as using concepts instead of methods to inquire.

引用

页码：686 / 698

页数：13

共 63 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1970, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences

[2]

[Anonymous], 1997, QUALITATIVE STUDIES

[3]

[Anonymous], DELEUZE AND ART

[4]

[Anonymous], 1995, THESIS

[5]

Bal M., 2002, Travelling concepts in the humanities: A rough guide

[6]

Barad Karen., 1999, The Science Studies Reader, P1

[7]

Baudrillard Jean., 1998, Simulacra and Simulations. Selected Writings, P166

[8] Deleuze's style [J].

Bogue, R .

MAN AND WORLD-AN INTERNATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1996, 29 (03) :251-268

[9]

Bogue Ronald., 1989, Deleuze and Guattari

[10] Taking Deleuze into the Field: Machinic Ethnography for the Social Sciences [J].

Bonta, Mark .

DELEUZE STUDIES, 2009, 3 (01) :135-142

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →