Explanations of socioeconomic differences in excess risk of type 2 diabetes in Swedish men and women

被引:84
作者
Agardh, EE
Ahlbom, A
Andersson, T
Efendic, S
Grill, V
Hallqvist, J
Östenson, CG
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med, Endocrine & Diabet Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Dept Epidemiol, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Ctr Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Div Social Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.27.3.716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - We investigated to what extent socioeconomic differences in type 2 diabetes risk could be explained by established risk factors (obesity, physical inactivity, smoking, and heredity) and psychosocial factors (low decision latitude at work and low sense of coherence). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- This cross-sectional study comprised 3,128 healthy Swedish men and 4,821 women, aged 35-56 years, living in the Stockholm area. An oral glucose tolerance test identified 55 men and 52 women with type 2 diabetes. The relative contribution of established and psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in diabetes risk was assessed by comparing analyses with adjustment for different sets of these factors. RESULTS- The relative risks (RRs) for type 2 diabetes in middle and low socioeconomic groups in men were 2.4 (95% CI 1.0-5.3) and 2.9 (1.5-5.7), respectively, and in women 3.2 (1.5-6.6) and 2.7 (1.3-5.9), respectively. In men, the RRs decreased to 1.9 (0.8-4.4) and 2.1 (1.0-4.2) after adjustment for established risk factors; no further change was found when psychosocial factors were included. In women, the RRs changed to 2.4 (1.1-5.2) and 1.6 (0.7-3.8) by including established risk factors and to 2.3 (1.0-5.1) and 1.9 (0.8-4.3) by inclusion of psychosocial factors. After adjustment for both established and psychosocial factors, the RRs were 1.4 (0.6-3.6) and 1.0 (0.4-2.5), respectively. CONCLUSIONS- In men, the excess risk of type 2 diabetes was partly explained by established risk factors (36-42%), whereas psychosocial factors had no effect. In women, most. of the socioeconomic differences in type 2 diabetes were explained by simultaneous adjustment for established risk factors and psychosocial factors (81-100%).
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 721
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Work stress and low sense of coherence is associated with type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Swedish women [J].
Agardh, EE ;
Ahlbom, A ;
Andersson, T ;
Efendic, S ;
Grill, V ;
Hallqvist, J ;
Norman, A ;
Östenson, CG .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) :719-724
[2]  
Antonovsky A., 1987, Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well, V1st
[3]  
BELKIE B, 2000, STATE ART REV OCCUPA, P24
[4]   Hypothalamic arousal, insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Björntorp, P ;
Holm, G ;
Rosmond, R .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1999, 16 (05) :373-383
[5]  
Carlsson S, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V148, P539, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009679
[6]  
COLE P, 1971, BRIT J PREV SOC MED, V25, P242
[7]   Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas [J].
Connolly, V ;
Unwin, N ;
Sherriff, P ;
Bilous, R ;
Kelly, W .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (03) :173-177
[8]   Socio-economic status, obesity and prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Evans, JMM ;
Newton, RW ;
Ruta, DA ;
MacDonald, TM ;
Morris, AD .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (06) :478-480
[9]   Capture-recapture-adjusted prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes are related to social deprivation [J].
Ismail, AA ;
Beeching, NJ ;
Gill, GV ;
Bellis, MA .
QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS, 1999, 92 (12) :707-710
[10]   SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS AND CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE - A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
KAPLAN, GA ;
KEIL, JE .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 88 (04) :1973-1998