Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception

被引:119
作者
Priori, Alberto [1 ]
Mameli, F. [1 ]
Cogiamanian, F. [1 ]
Marceglia, S. [1 ]
Tiriticco, M. [1 ]
Mrakic-Sposta, S.
Ferrucci, R. [1 ]
Zago, S. [1 ]
Polezzi, D. [2 ]
Sartori, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Neurol Sci, Fondaz IRCCS, Osped Maggiroe Policlin, I-20122 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Psychol, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
deception; frontal cortex; human; lies; tDCS;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhm088
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Lies are intentional distortions of event knowledge. No experimental data are available on manipulating lying processes. To address this issue, we stimulated the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Fifteen healthy volunteers were tested before and after tDCS (anodal, cathodal, and sham). Two types of truthful (truthful selected: TS; truthful unselected: TU) and deceptive (lie selected: LS; lie unselected: LU) responses were evaluated using a computer-controlled task. Reaction times (RTs) and accuracy were collected and used as dependent variables. In the baseline task, the RT was significantly longer for lie responses than for true responses ([mean +/- standard error] 1153.4 +/- 42.0 ms vs. 1039.6 +/- 36.6 ms; F-1,F-14 = 27.25, P = 0.00013). At baseline, RT for selected pictures was significantly shorter than RT for unselected pictures (1051.26 +/- 39.0 ms vs. 1141.76 +/- 41.1 ms; F-1,F-14 = 34.85, P = 0.00004). Whereas after cathodal and sham stimulation, lie responses remained unchanged (cathodal 5.26 +/- 2.7%; sham 5.66 +/- 3.6%), after anodal tDCS, RTs significantly increased but did so only for LS responses (16.86 +/- 5.0%; P = 0.002). These findings show that manipulation of brain function with DLPFC tDCS specifically influences experimental deception and that distinctive neural mechanisms underlie different types of lies.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 455
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Dissociable roles of prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception [J].
Abe, N ;
Suzuki, M ;
Tsukiura, T ;
Mori, E ;
Yamaguchi, K ;
Itoh, M ;
Fujii, T .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2006, 16 (02) :192-199
[2]   Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex [J].
Antal, A ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Paulus, W .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2006, 68 (06) :459-463
[3]   External modulation of visual perception in humans [J].
Antal, A ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Paulus, W .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (16) :3553-3555
[4]   Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans [J].
Antal, A ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Kruse, W ;
Kincses, TZ ;
Hoffmann, KP ;
Paulus, W .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 16 (04) :521-527
[5]   Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain [J].
Ardolino, G ;
Bossi, B ;
Barbieri, S ;
Priori, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 568 (02) :653-663
[6]  
Baudewig J, 2001, MAGN RESON MED, V45, P196, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<196::AID-MRM1026>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-1
[8]   Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease [J].
Boggio, Paulo S. ;
Ferrucci, Roberta ;
Rigonatti, Sergio P. ;
Covre, Priscila ;
Nitsche, Michael ;
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro ;
Fregni, Felipe .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 249 (01) :31-38
[9]   Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update [J].
Botvinick, Matthew M. ;
Cohen, Jonathan D. ;
Carter, Cameron S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (12) :539-546
[10]  
COGIAMANIAN F, 2007, EUR J NEUROSCI