Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey

被引:128
作者
Pucher, J [1 ]
Renne, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Bloustein Sch Planning & Publ Policy, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
accessibility; mobility; mode choice; rural; socioeconomics; travel behavior; urban;
D O I
10.1007/s11116-004-5508-3
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article uses data from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) to compare travel behavior in rural and urban areas of the U.S. As expected, the car is the overwhelmingly dominant mode of travel. Over 97% of rural households own at least one car vs. 92% of urban households; 91% of trips are made by car in rural areas vs. 86% in urban areas. Regardless of age, income, and race, almost everyone in rural areas relies on the private car for most travel needs. Mobility levels in rural areas are generally higher than in urban areas. That results from the more dispersed residences and activity sites in rural areas, which increase trip distances and force reliance on the car. Somewhat surprisingly, the rural elderly and poor are considerably more mobile than their urban counterparts, and their mobility deficit compared to the rural population average is strikingly less than for the urban elderly and poor compared to the urban average. Data limitations prevented a measurement of accessibility, however, and it seems likely that rural areas, by their very nature, are less accessible than urban areas, especially for the small percentage of car-less poor and elderly households.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 186
页数:22
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AM PUBL TRANSP AS, 2002, PUBL TRANSP FACT BOO
[2]  
BEALE C, 1999, RURAL CONDITIONS TRE, V9, P20
[3]  
BORGEN S, 1998, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTA, V16, P10
[4]  
*COMM TRANSP ASS A, 2004, NAT SUMM STAT FED FU
[5]  
*FED TRANS ADM, 2003, 2002 STAT SUMM GRANT
[6]  
*FED TRANS ADM, 2003, NAT TRANS DAT 2001
[7]  
FOSTER NSJ, 1995, TRANSPORT Q, V49, P51
[8]   Older nonmetropolitan residents' evaluations of their transportation arrangements [J].
Glasgow, N ;
Blakely, RM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2000, 19 (01) :95-116
[9]  
Hagerstrand T., 1970, Papers in Regional Science Association, V24, P1, DOI 10.1007/BF01936872
[10]  
HALFACRE K, 1995, RURAL STUDIES, V1, P1