Soybean cultivars and insect defoliation: Yield loss and economic injury levels

被引:57
作者
Haile, FJ [1 ]
Higley, LG [1 ]
Specht, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000030006x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Understanding the response of soybean [Glycine mau (L.) Merr.] cultivars to insert defoliation is important for identifying differences in insect tolerance and compensation among soybean genotypes, for assessing yield loss differences among cultivars, and fur determining if a single economic injury level (EIL) can he used for all cultivars. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the relative tolerance of selected soybean cultivars to insect defoliation, Field experiments were conducted in 1994 and 1995 on three indeterminate soybean cultivars: Dunbar, Corsica, and Clark. Sequential defoliation (46-66%) was imposed manually at the R2 stage (reproductive development of soybean at full flowering), guided by an insect consumption model. Leaf area index, percent light interception, growth, and yield data were determined. Because of ample rainfall during the soybean growing period in 1994, defoliation did not affect soybean yield; all cultivars compensated for all levels of defoliation via delayed leaf senescence and compensatory regrowth, which enhanced the light interception capacity of defoliated soybean canopies. In 1995, however, defoliation caused a significant yield reduction (15-70%) in all cultivars; this yield reduction was greater for Dunbar than the other two cultivars. In both Sears, yields were directly related to the light interception capacity of soybean canopies after defoliation. There were significant EIL differences among soybean cultivars. Large differences in EILs among cultivars suggest a need to revise existing EILs for defoliating pest species.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 352
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   HERBIVORY SIMULATIONS IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH [J].
BALDWIN, IT .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1990, 5 (03) :91-93
[2]  
BOOTE KJ, 1981, CONCEPTS MODELING CR
[3]   INTEGRATED RESPONSES OF PLANTS TO STRESS [J].
CHAPIN, FS .
BIOSCIENCE, 1991, 41 (01) :29-36
[4]   CRITICAL STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT FOR DEFOLIATION OF SOYBEAN [J].
FEHR, WR ;
LAWRENCE, BK ;
THOMPSON, TA .
CROP SCIENCE, 1981, 21 (02) :259-262
[5]   RESPONSE OF INDETERMINATE AND DETERMINATE SOYBEAN CULTIVARS TO DEFOLIATION AND HALF-PLANT CUT-OFF [J].
FEHR, WR ;
CAVINESS, CE ;
VORST, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (06) :913-917
[6]  
FUNDERBURK JE, 1994, SUSTAINABLE AGR SYST, P199
[7]   DETERMINATION OF YIELD-LOSS RELATIONSHIPS FOR 2 SOYBEAN DEFOLIATORS BY USING SIMULATED INSECT-DEFOLIATION TECHNIQUES [J].
HAMMOND, RB ;
PEDIGO, LP .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1982, 75 (01) :102-107
[8]  
Higley L.G., 1992, Pest management in soybean, P56
[9]  
HIGLEY LG, 1993, INTERNATIONAL CROP SCIENCE I, P749
[10]   SOYBEAN GROWTH AND YIELD AFTER SIMULATED BEAN LEAF BEETLE INJURY TO SEEDLINGS [J].
HUNT, TE ;
HIGLEY, LG ;
WITKOWSKI, JF .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (01) :140-146