Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis

被引:191
作者
Rajesh, R. [1 ]
Rajendran, Chandrasekharan [2 ]
机构
[1] ABV Indian Inst Informat Technol & Management, Management Div, Gwalior, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Madras, Dept Management Studies DoMS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
bootstrapping; ESG scores; PLS analysis; sustainability performances; sustainable development; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT; ESG PERFORMANCE; COMPANIES; PATH; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2429
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores can act as an indicator for sustainability performance of organizations. This paper explores an empirical evidence for the relationship binding ESG scores and sustainability performances of firms. We observe and evaluate the ESG performance scores of 1,820 firms globally for 5 years, from 2014 to 2018 on 10 major themes and over 400 different indicators, as listed by Thomson Reuters and is captured from the Bloomberg terminal data. We posit five hypotheses to check the relations binding ESG scores and the total sustainability performances of firms. A Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis and standard bootstrapping using Smart PLS 3.0 software is used to observe the results and to evidence the direct and moderating effects among latent variables contributing to sustainability performances. We observe a significant and negative moderating effect of ESG performances, independently over the all direct relations, considering their relationship to ESG performances. One of the major implications of this research is in the direction of assigning priorities while considering environmental-, social-, and governance-related themes in the implementation of any strategies or policies into practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1267
页数:21
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]
A probabilistic weighting model for setting priorities in assessing sustainability performance [J].
Ahi, Payman ;
Searcy, Cory ;
Jaber, Mohamad Y. .
SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 13 :80-92
[2]
Ali S.M., 2018, Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag, V19, P53, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40171-017-0176-2
[3]
[Anonymous], THOMSON REUTERS ESG
[4]
The value relevance of banking sector multidimensional corporate sustainability performance [J].
Aras, Guler ;
Tezcan, Nuray ;
Furtuna, Ozlem Kutlu .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (06) :1062-1073
[5]
COMPOSITE RELIABILITY IN STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING [J].
BACON, DR ;
SAUER, PL ;
YOUNG, M .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1995, 55 (03) :394-406
[6]
Balatbat M., 2012, Australian School of Business School of Accounting, School of Accounting Seminar Series Semester, V2, P1
[7]
Oceanic variability and coastal topography shape genetic structure in a long-dispersing sea urchin [J].
Banks, Sam C. ;
Piggott, Maxine P. ;
Williamson, Jane E. ;
Bove, Ulysse ;
Holbrook, Neil J. ;
Beheregaray, Luciano B. .
ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (12) :3055-3064
[8]
The Effect of Family Ownership on Different Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Large US Firms [J].
Block, Joern H. ;
Wagner, Marcus .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (07) :475-492
[9]
Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India [J].
Bodhanwala, Shernaz ;
Bodhanwala, Ruzbeh .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2018, 56 (08) :1734-1747
[10]
Corporate Sustainability Performance and Assurance on Sustainability Reports: Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the Realm of Sustainable Development [J].
Braam, Geert ;
Peeters, Roy .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 25 (02) :164-181