How strong are familiarity preferences in shoaling fish?

被引:62
作者
Barber, I [1 ]
Wright, HA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Fish Biol Grp, Inst Biomed & Life Sci, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1006/anbe.2000.1665
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individual fish of certain species show preferences for rejoining shoals of familiar individuals, suggesting that the development of familiarity within groups may be beneficial to group members. However, the relative value of shoaling with familiar individuals compared to, for example, joining a larger or more phenotypically matched group, is not known. We first confirmed, in separate experiments, that European minnows, Phoxinus phoxinus, prefer to join shoals of familiar individuals (with which they had been kept for 14 days) over unfamiliar ones, and show an increasing preference for the larger of two unfamiliar shoals presented in numerical size ratios of 1:1, 1:1.2, 1:1.9 and 1:4. In the latter experiment, test fish showed a marginal preference for the larger shoal at size ratio 1:1.2, and significant preferences in the 1:1.9 and 1:4 trials. To examine how test fish traded off familiarity against group size, we used the same shoal size ratios in a third experiment, this time with the smaller shoal being composed of individuals familiar to the test fish. In these trials, preferences for larger (nonfamiliar) and smaller (familiar) groups were balanced at the 1:1.9 shoal size ratio, and test fish significantly preferred the larger shoal only in the 1:4 trials. This suggests that the fish perceive the value of shoaling with familiars as equivalent to the benefits gained by doubling shoal size. Our results also indicate that preferences for familiar shoalmates are sufficient to offset defection to slightly larger groups. We discuss how this may stabilize group composition in natural habitats. (C) 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 979
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
[2]  
ASHLEY EJ, 1993, COPEIA, P540
[3]   The importance of stable schooling: do familiar sticklebacks stick together? [J].
Barber, I ;
Ruxton, GD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 267 (1439) :151-155
[4]   Parasitism, oddity and the mechanism of shoal choice [J].
Barber, I ;
Downey, LC ;
Braithwaite, VA .
JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 1998, 53 (06) :1365-1368
[5]   MORTALITY OF THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY (DANAUS-PLEXIPPUS L) - AVIAN PREDATION AT 5 OVERWINTERING SITES IN MEXICO [J].
CALVERT, WH ;
HEDRICK, LE ;
BROWER, LP .
SCIENCE, 1979, 204 (4395) :847-851
[6]   FAMILIARITY AND SHOAL COHESION IN FATHEAD MINNOWS (PIMEPHALES-PROMELAS) - IMPLICATIONS FOR ANTIPREDATOR BEHAVIOR [J].
CHIVERS, DP ;
BROWN, GE ;
SMITH, RJF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1995, 73 (05) :955-960
[7]   JUVENILE 3-SPINED STICKLEBACKS AVOID PARASITIZED CONSPECIFICS [J].
DUGATKIN, LA ;
FITZGERALD, GJ ;
LAVOIE, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 1994, 39 (02) :215-218
[8]   EVIDENCE FOR THE DILUTION EFFECT IN THE SELFISH HERD FROM FISH PREDATION ON A MARINE INSECT [J].
FOSTER, WA ;
TREHERNE, JE .
NATURE, 1981, 293 (5832) :466-467
[9]   Schooling decisions in gunnies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching [J].
Griffiths, SW ;
Magurran, AE .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1999, 45 (06) :437-443
[10]   Familiarity in schooling fish: How long does it take to acquire? [J].
Griffiths, SW ;
Magurran, AE .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1997, 53 :945-949