Magnitude adjustment for AHP benefit/cost ratios

被引:32
作者
Wedley, WC [1 ]
Choo, EU [1 ]
Schoner, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Fac Business Adm, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; benefit/cost analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00302-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A feature of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) that has not been subject to close scrutiny is its use for benefit/cost analysis. If benefit priorities are divided by project costs to yield benefit points per dollar, then the resulting numbers can be used to allocate program budgets. But if benefit priorities and cost priorities are derived from two separate hierarchies, then it is likely that the ratio of benefit priorities to cost priorities produces misleading results. To correct the situation, adjustments must be made to put the numerator and denominator priorities into commensurate terms. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 351
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN THE BENEFIT COST FRAMEWORK - A POST-EVALUATION OF THE TRANS-SUMATRA HIGHWAY PROJECT [J].
AZIS, IJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :38-48
[2]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[3]   KNAPSACK ALLOCATION OF MULTIPLE RESOURCES IN BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS BY WAY OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
BENNETT, JP ;
SAATY, TL .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1993, 17 (4-5) :55-72
[4]  
Bernhard R.H., 1990, ENG ECON, V36, P56, DOI [10.1080/00137919008903031, DOI 10.1080/00137919008903031]
[5]   BENEFIT-COST-ANALYSIS OF RIVERBOAT GAMBLING [J].
CLAYTON, WA ;
WRIGHT, M ;
SARVER, WS .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1993, 17 (4-5) :187-194
[6]   REMARKS ON THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
DYER, JS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (03) :249-258
[7]  
DYER JS, 1985, 8485424 U TEX DEP MA
[8]  
Forman E., 1983, EXPERT CHOICE DECISI
[9]  
Gramlich EM., 1981, BENEFIT COST ANAL GO
[10]  
MISHAN EJ, 1982, COST BENEFIT ANAL