Operational and safety analyses of a commercial PEMFC system

被引:43
作者
Gerbec, Marko [1 ]
Jovan, Vladimir [1 ]
Petrovcic, Janko [1 ]
机构
[1] Jozef Stefan Inst, Dept Inorgan Chem & Technol, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
PEM fuel cell; reliability; process safety; hydrogen;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.04.063
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 [物理化学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
A commercial, transportable proton-exchange-membrane fuel-cell (PEMFC) system rated at 7 kW nominal power was the subject of an operational (reliability, availability, and maintainability) and process-safety analysis. The scope of the analysis included the system start-up to engine-run mode, the maintenance tasks, as well as the continuous power-production mode, carried out with a hazard and operability (HAZOP) study and a failure-scenarios' development. The failure and process-safety risks were categorized and the probabilities were assessed with a fault-tree analysis (FTA) using equipment-failure-rate data from the literature, if available. The results led to similar conclusions to those previously reported in similar studies, and the most important equipment/devices with respect to reliability and safety aspects were identified. While the most important uncertainty in the complete analysis comes from the generic equipment failure-rate data used, about three failures in the first year of operation are estimated together with an availability of about 98% (a point value figures, confidence interval analysis was also made). The process-safety analysis revealed four potential accident scenarios involving hydrogen releases, fires and explosions. Finally, detailed suggestions and recommendations for changes/improvements with respect to the reliability/availability, maintainability and safety aspects of the system analysed are presented. (C) 2008 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4147 / 4160
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[2]
[Anonymous], METHODS DETERMINING
[3]
Reliability analysis and initial requirements for FC systems and stacks [J].
Astrom, K. ;
Fontell, E. ;
Virtanen, S. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2007, 171 (01) :46-54
[4]
Numerical simulation of hydrogen-air detonation for damage assessment in realistic accident scenarios [J].
Bedard-Tremblay, L. ;
Fang, L. ;
Bauwens, L. ;
Cheng, Z. ;
Tchouvelev, A. V. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (02) :154-161
[5]
BOULDER F, 2007, TOLERABILITY RISK 1
[6]
Center for Chemical Process Safety, 1989, GUID PROC EQ REL DAT
[7]
The hazards and risks of hydrogen [J].
Crowl, Daniel A. ;
Jo, Young-Do .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2007, 20 (02) :158-164
[8]
Experimental analysis of water management in a self-humidifying polymer electrolyte fuel cell stack [J].
Eckl, R ;
Zehtner, W ;
Leu, C ;
Wagner, U .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2004, 138 (1-2) :137-144
[9]
Reliability of Plug Power GenSys™ fuel cell systems [J].
Feitelberg, AS ;
Stathopoulos, J ;
Qi, ZG ;
Smith, C ;
Elter, JF .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2005, 147 (1-2) :203-207
[10]
Mechanisms of high-pressure hydrogen gas self-ignition in tubes [J].
Golub, V. V. ;
Baklanov, D. I. ;
Golovastov, S. V. ;
Ivanov, M. F. ;
Laskin, I. N. ;
Saveliev, A. S. ;
Semin, N. V. ;
Volodin, V. V. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (02) :185-198