Urinary diversion-related outcome in patients with pelvic recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

被引:38
作者
Tefilli, MV
Gheiler, EL
Tiguert, R
Grignon, DJ
Forman, JD
Pontes, JE
Wood, DP
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00623-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate the impact of urinary diversion on disease status, complications, and subsequent treatment in patients with pelvic tumor recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methods. A retrospective review of 201 consecutive cases of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, performed at our institution between March 1991 and March 1996, identified 33 patients (16.4%) with disease recurrence in the pelvis with or without systemic metastasis. Urinary diversion in patients with tumor recurrence was an ileal conduit, continent cutaneous diversion, or orthotopic neobladder in 19, 3, and 11 patients, respectively. The mean follow-up for all patients undergoing cystectomy was 25.9 months (range 8 to 75). The mean time to diagnosis of local disease recurrence after cystectomy was 13.9 months (range 5 to 50). Results. In 21 (63.6%) of 33 patients, pelvic recurrence and systemic metastasis were present simultaneously. Disease recurrence was associated with poor outcome: only 8 patients (24.2%) were alive and disease free, 7 of whom had isolated local recurrence without evidence of systemic metastasis. There was no difference in overall survival or type of therapy delivered once disease recurrence was diagnosed between patients with an orthotopic neobladder and those with a cutaneous (continent or incontinent) urinary diversion. The only diversion-related complication resulting from pelvic recurrence was 1 case of tumor invasion into an orthotopic neobladder, requiring conversion to an ileal conduit. Conclusions. The type of urinary diversion did not impact a patient's risk of complications, the ability to receive salvage treatment, or overall survival once pelvic recurrence was diagnosed. Patients at high risk of pelvic recurrence should not be excluded from receiving an orthotopic urinary diversion. UROLOGY 53: 999-1004, 1999. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1004
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR STAGE-TA, STAGE-TIS AND STAGE-T1 TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER [J].
AMLING, CL ;
THRASHER, JB ;
FRAZIER, HA ;
DODGE, RK ;
ROBERTSON, JE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) :31-36
[2]  
BEAHRS OH, 1992, MANUAL STAGING CANC, P195
[3]   HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE AFTER CYSTECTOMY - BLADDER SUBSTITUTION COMPARED WITH ILEAL CONDUIT DIVERSION - A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY [J].
BJERRE, BD ;
JOHANSEN, C ;
STEVEN, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (02) :200-205
[4]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE SURVEY OF URINARY-DIVERSION PATIENTS - COMPARISON OF ILEAL CONDUITS VERSUS CONTINENT KOCK ILEAL RESERVOIRS [J].
BOYD, SD ;
FEINBERG, SM ;
SKINNER, DG ;
LIESKOVSKY, G ;
BARON, D ;
RICHARDSON, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 138 (06) :1386-1389
[5]  
Cancrini A, 1996, EUR UROL, V29, P204
[6]   LIFE WITH AN ILEAL CONDUIT IN CYSTECTOMIZED BLADDER-CANCER PATIENTS - EXPECTATIONS AND EXPERIENCE [J].
FOSSA, SD ;
REITAN, JB ;
OUS, S ;
KAALHUS, O .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1987, 21 (02) :97-101
[7]   COMPLICATIONS OF RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND URINARY-DIVERSION - A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF 675 CASES IN 2 DECADES [J].
FRAZIER, H ;
ROBERTSON, JE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1401-1405
[8]  
FRAZIER HA, 1993, CANCER, V71, P3993, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12<3993::AID-CNCR2820711233>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-Y
[10]   Urethral recurrence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders [J].
Freeman, JA ;
Tarter, TA ;
Esrig, D ;
Stein, JP ;
Elmajian, DA ;
Chen, SC ;
Groshen, S ;
Lieskovsky, G ;
Skinner, DG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1615-1619