Brief alcohol intervention for general hospital inpatients: A randomized controlled trial

被引:43
作者
Freyer-Adam, Jennis [1 ]
Coder, Beate [1 ]
Baumeister, Sebastian E. [1 ]
Bischof, Gallus [2 ]
Riedel, Jeannette [3 ]
Paatsch, Karin [1 ]
Wedler, Barbara [1 ]
Rumpf, Hans-Juergen [2 ]
John, Ulrich [1 ]
Hapke, Ulfert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greifswald, Inst Epidemiol & Social Med, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
[2] Med Univ Lubeck, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[3] Univ Greifswald, Inst Med Psychol, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
关键词
alcohol; brief intervention; motivational interviewing; randomized controlled trial; general hospital;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.09.016
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To test the effectiveness of a brief alcohol intervention among non-dependent general hospital inpatients with alcohol problems, delivered by either a specialized liaison service or hospital physicians. Method: All inpatients of 29 wards from four general hospitals of one region in Germany were screened for alcohol problems (n= 14,332). Of those screening positive, 595 patients were included in a randomized controlled group design using a time-frame. Patients with alcohol dependence were not considered in this study. Patients received Motivational Interviewing based counselling either by a specialized liaison service, by hospital physicians trained under routine conditions or received hospital treatment as usual without additional counselling. One year later, alcohol consumption, motivation and well-being were assessed. Sample survey analyses and generalized estimating equations were conducted. Results: At baseline, the three groups differed regarding motivation, with higher motivation among the controls. At follow-up, the groups did not differ regarding alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems and well-being. All groups decreased their alcohol consumption significantly. Regarding motivation, longitudinal analyses revealed significant interaction effects of time and intervention (p < 0.05), indicating a stronger increase of readiness to change drinking and a less profound drop of readiness to seek help among those who received intervention compared to the controls. Conclusion: The intervention was not effective in reducing alcohol consumption or in increasing well-being 12 months after hospitalization. It had a positive effect on readiness to change drinking and on readiness to seek formal help for alcohol problems. The intervention groups compensated their lag of motivation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 243
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
Allen JP, 1997, J STUD ALCOHOL, V58, P7
[2]
What is this thing called motivational interviewing? [J].
Allsop, Steve .
ADDICTION, 2007, 102 (03) :343-345
[3]
American Psychiatric Association, 1995, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[4]
[Anonymous], 1995, Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Gesundheitsverhaltens (FEG): Handanweisung [Questionnaire to Assess Health Behaviour]
[5]
[Anonymous], HLTH PROMOT INT
[6]
[Anonymous], ALC GUID SENS DRINK
[7]
ANTTIPOIKA I, 1988, ALCOHOL ALCOHOLISM, V23, P115
[8]
A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice [J].
Ashenden, R ;
Silagy, C ;
Weller, D .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1997, 14 (02) :160-175
[9]
BABOR TF, 1992, PROGRAMME SUBSTANCE
[10]
Brief interventions for at-risk drinking: Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness in managed care organizations [J].
Babor, Thomas F. ;
Higgins-Biddle, John C. ;
Dauser, Deborah ;
Burleson, Joseph A. ;
Zarkin, Gary A. ;
Bray, Jeremy .
ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2006, 41 (06) :624-631