The suitability of an in situ perfusion model for permeability determinations: Utility for BCS class I biowaiver requests

被引:141
作者
Kim, Jae-Seung [1 ]
Mitchell, Stefanie [1 ]
Kijek, Paul [1 ]
Tsume, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Hilfinger, John [1 ]
Amidon, Gordon L. [1 ]
机构
[1] TSRL Inc, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
关键词
Biopharmaceutics Classification System; bioavailability; in situ rat perfusion; permeability; confidence interval;
D O I
10.1021/mp060042f
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 [基础医学];
摘要
The FDA has published recommendations for sponsors who wish to request a waiver of in vivo bioavailability (BA) or bioequivalence (BE) studies for immediate release (IR) solid oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS). Biowaivers can be requested for IR formulations in which the active ingredient is shown to be a BCS class I drug: that is, a drug showing high permeability and high solubility over a pH range of 1-7.5. For permeability determinations, a variety of experimental methods can be used, such as the rat in situ single pass perfusion or Caco-2 cell culture models, once the suitability of the particular method is established. Following the recommended procedure for assessing the suitability of permeability determinations, we determined the permeability of 20 test drugs using the in situ single pass perfusion model in rats. The test compounds were coperfused through jejunal intestinal segments with an internal permeability reference standard (metoprolol) over a 90 min time period. Sample analysis was performed by HPLC, and the ratio of the effective permeability, P-eff (cm/s), of test compound to that of metoprolol was determined. To address the question of test drug permeabilities that approach that of the internal standard, we propose that a statistical analysis such as the "0.8-1.25 rule" used for in vivo or in vitro bioequivalence studies provide guidance for permeability classification using the in situ single pass perfusion model. We developed a method using the 90% confidence interval of the permeability ratio of the test to internal reference standard in order to differentiate between high and low permeability compounds. This analysis allowed for the proper permeability classification of all of the test compounds and suggests a robust means for assessing drug permeability classification.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 694
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
ESTIMATING HUMAN ORAL FRACTION DOSE ABSORBED - A CORRELATION USING RAT INTESTINAL-MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY FOR PASSIVE AND CARRIER-MEDIATED COMPOUNDS [J].
AMIDON, GL ;
SINKO, PJ ;
FLEISHER, D .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 5 (10) :651-654
[2]
A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR A BIOPHARMACEUTIC DRUG CLASSIFICATION - THE CORRELATION OF IN-VITRO DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION AND IN-VIVO BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
AMIDON, GL ;
LENNERNAS, H ;
SHAH, VP ;
CRISON, JR .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 12 (03) :413-420
[3]
CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL-DRUG ABSORPTION IN HUMANS AND APPARENT DRUG PERMEABILITY COEFFICIENTS IN HUMAN INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL (CACO-2) CELLS [J].
ARTURSSON, P ;
KARLSSON, J .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 175 (03) :880-885
[4]
pH-metric solubility. 3. Dissolution titration template method for solubility determination [J].
Avdeef, A ;
Berger, CM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2001, 14 (04) :281-291
[5]
pH-metric solubility. 2: Correlation between the acid-base titration and the saturation shake-flask solubility-pH methods [J].
Avdeef, A ;
Berger, CM ;
Brownell, C .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 17 (01) :85-89
[6]
The biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS): Class III drugs - better candidates for BA/BE waiver? [J].
Blume, HH ;
Schug, BS .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 9 (02) :117-121
[7]
Intestinal absorptive transport of the hydrophilic cation ranitidine:: A kinetic modeling approach to elucidate the role of uptake and efflux transporters and paracellular vs. transcellular transport in caco-2 cells [J].
Bourdet, David L. ;
Pollack, Gary M. ;
Thakker, Dhiren R. .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 23 (06) :1178-1187
[8]
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2001, STAT APPR EST BIOEQ
[9]
*CTR DRUG EV RES, 2006, APPR DRUG PROD THER
[10]
*CTR DRUG EV RES, 1999, WAIV IN VIV BIOAV BI