Maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase/murine protein serine-threonine kinase 38 is a promising therapeutic target for multiple cancers

被引:150
作者
Gray, D
Jubb, AM
Hogue, D
Dowd, P
Kljavin, N
Yi, S
Bai, W
Frantz, G
Zhang, ZM
Koeppen, H
de Sauvage, FJ
Davis, DP
机构
[1] Genentech Inc, Dept Mol Biol, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[2] Genentech Inc, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[3] Genentech Inc, Dept Bioinformat, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4531
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To identify genes that could serve as targets for novel cancer therapeutics, we used a bioinformatic analysis of microarray data comparing gene expression between normal and tumor-derived primary human tissues. From this approach, we have found that maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (Melk), a member of the AMP serine/threonine kinase family, exhibits multiple features consistent with the potential utility of this gene as an anticancer target. An oligonucleotide microarray analysis of multiple human tumor samples and cell lines suggests that Melk expression is frequently elevated in cancer relative to normal tissues, a pattern confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and Western blotting of selected primary tumor samples. In situ hybridization localized Melk expression to malignant epithelial cells in 96%, 23%, and 13% of colorectal, lung, and ovarian tissue tumor samples, respectively. Expression of this gene is also elevated in spontaneous tumors derived from the Apec(Min) and Apc(1638N) murine models of intestinal tumorigenesis. To begin addressing whether Melk is relevant for tumorigenesis, RNA interference-mediated silencing within human and murine tumor cell lines was done. We show that Melk knockdown decreases proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in vitro as well as tumor growth in a xenograft model. Together, these results suggest that Melk may provide a growth advantage for neoplastic cells and, therefore, inactivation may be therapeutically beneficial.
引用
收藏
页码:9751 / 9761
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Agrawal D, 1996, MOL CELL BIOL, V16, P4327
[2]  
Black EP, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P3716
[3]   Cell cycle regulation of pEg3, a new Xenopus protein kinase of the KIN1/PAR-1/MARK family [J].
Blot, J ;
Chartrain, I ;
Roghi, C ;
Philippe, M ;
Tassan, JP .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 241 (02) :327-338
[4]   A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells [J].
Brummelkamp, TR ;
Bernards, R ;
Agami, R .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5567) :550-553
[5]   Dual phosphorylation controls Cdc25 phosphatases and mitotic entry [J].
Bulavin, DV ;
Higashimoto, Y ;
Demidenko, ZN ;
Meek, S ;
Graves, P ;
Phillips, C ;
Zhao, H ;
Moody, SA ;
Appella, E ;
Piwnica-Worms, H ;
Fornace, AJ .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 5 (06) :545-551
[6]   Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems [J].
Caplen, NJ ;
Parrish, S ;
Imani, F ;
Fire, A ;
Morgan, RA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (17) :9742-9747
[7]   Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Cunningham, D ;
Humblet, Y ;
Siena, S ;
Khayat, D ;
Bleiberg, H ;
Santoro, A ;
Bets, D ;
Mueser, M ;
Harstrick, A ;
Verslype, C ;
Chau, I ;
Van Cutsem, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (04) :337-345
[8]   Human pEg3 kinase associates with and phosphorylates CDC25B phosphatase: a potential role for pEg3 in cell cycle regulation [J].
Davezac, N ;
Baldin, W ;
Blot, J ;
Ducommun, B ;
Tassan, JP .
ONCOGENE, 2002, 21 (50) :7630-7641
[9]   Perspectives on the development of a molecularly targeted agent [J].
Druker, BJ .
CANCER CELL, 2002, 1 (01) :31-36
[10]   Neural progenitor genes - Germinal zone expression and analysis of genetic overlap in stem cell populations [J].
Easterday, MC ;
Dougherty, JD ;
Jackson, RL ;
Ou, J ;
Nakano, I ;
Paucar, AA ;
Roobini, B ;
Dianati, M ;
Irvin, DK ;
Weissman, IL ;
Terskikh, AV ;
Geschwind, DH ;
Kornblum, HI .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 264 (02) :309-322