The case for international coordination of electricity regulation: Evidence from the measurement of efficiency in South America

被引:74
作者
Estache, A [1 ]
Rossi, MA
Ruzzier, CA
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, ECARES, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Econ, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] Univ Argentina Empresa, Ctr Estudios Econ Regulac, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Argentina Empresa, Dept Econ & Finanzas, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
efficiency; regulation; yardstick competition; electricity;
D O I
10.1023/B:REGE.0000017750.21982.36
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A decade of experience has shown that monitoring the performance of public and private monopolies is the hardest part of electricity sector reform in South America-because operators control most of the information needed for effective regulation. South American electricity regulators can reduce this information asymmetry by increasing international coordination and relying on comparative measures of efficiency To make it possible for them to do so, countries should harmonize their regulatory databases and develop methodologies for making comparisons. This paper uses data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis to estimate the efficiency of South America's main electricity distribution companies. Both approaches allow regulators to use relatively simple tests to check the robustness of their findings, strengthening their positions at regulatory hearings.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 295
页数:25
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
AGRELL P, 2002, DEA DYNAMIC YARDSTIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, EUR J OPER RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, MEASUREMENT PRODUCTI
[4]  
[Anonymous], DESIGNING REGULATORY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, B ECON RES
[6]  
Armstrong M., 1994, Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British experience
[7]   Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: A non-parametric model of the Turkish experience [J].
Bagdadioglu, N ;
Price, CMW ;
WeymanJones, TG .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1996, 18 (1-2) :1-23
[8]  
Baldwin R., 2012, UNDERSTANDING REGULA
[9]  
BATTESE G, 1977, AUST J AGR ECON, V21, P39
[10]  
Battese G.E., 1992, J. Product. Anal., V3, P153, DOI [10.1007/BF00158774, DOI 10.1007/BF00158774]