Modeling the relationship between occupational stressors, psychosocial/physical symptoms and injuries in the construction industry

被引:73
作者
Abbe, Omosefe O. [1 ]
Harvey, Craig M. [1 ]
Ikuma, Laura H. [1 ]
Aghazadeh, Fereydoun [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Construct Management & Ind Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
Construction Ergonomics; Occupational Safety; Psychosocial Factors; Industrial Construction; Construction Safety; RISK-FACTORS; JOB DEMANDS; WORKERS; INTERVENTION; LABORERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Injury statistics place the construction industry as a high-risk industry, making it necessary to investigate factors that influence accidents to be able to protect workers. Research was carried out to investigate the relationship existing among occupational stressors, psychological/physical symptoms and accident/injury and work days lost outcomes as experienced by manual workers engaged in a range of industrial construction occupations. Some of the occupational stressors significantly associated with self-reported and OSHA logged injuries were training, job certainty and safety climate of the company. The OSHA logged injuries were associated with the occurrence of headaches and feelings of tenseness on the job. These results imply that non-physical stressors should be included as a potential input associated with injuries in injury risk models for construction workers. Relevance to industry: Traditional approaches to workers' safety in the construction industry have focused on the physical and biomechanical aspects of work by improving tools, equipment and task completion methods. The impact of psychosocial factors, specifically stress as experienced by construction workers, is an area of growing research, which is yielding results that suggest overall work safety on the construction site should take into account psychosocial aspects of work. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OCCUPATIONAL STRESS
[2]  
Beehr T., 1987, JOB STRESS THEORY SU, P5
[3]   Technological intervention to eliminate back injury risks for nailing [J].
Bernold, LE ;
Lorenc, SJ ;
Davis, ML .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (03) :245-250
[4]  
BLS, 2008, NAT CENS FAT OCC INJ
[5]   In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry [J].
Chi, Chia-Fen ;
Yang, Chong-Cheng ;
Chen, Zheng-Lun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2009, 39 (04) :635-644
[6]  
COOPER CL, 1987, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V29, P119
[7]   Reasons for adopting technological innovations reducing physical workload in bricklaying [J].
De Jong, AM ;
Vink, P ;
De Kroon, JCA .
ERGONOMICS, 2003, 46 (11) :1091-1108
[8]  
French J.R.P., 1982, The mechanisms of job stress and strain
[9]   Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers [J].
Gillen, M ;
Baltz, D ;
Gassel, M ;
Kirsch, L ;
Vaccaro, D .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (01) :33-51
[10]   Psychosocial factors and safety behaviour as predictors of accidental work injuries in farming [J].
Glasscock, David J. ;
Rasmussen, Kurt ;
Carstensen, Ole ;
Hansen, Ole N. .
WORK AND STRESS, 2006, 20 (02) :173-189