Small-scale farming in semi-arid areas: Livelihood dynamics between 1997 and 2010 in Laikipia, Kenya

被引:75
作者
Ulrich, Anne [1 ]
Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika [2 ,3 ]
Roden, Paul [1 ]
Kiteme, Boniface [3 ]
Wiesmann, Urs [2 ]
Nuesser, Marcus [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, SAI, Dept Geog, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Bern, CDE, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Training & Integrated Res Arid & Semiarid Lan, Nanyuki 10400, Kenya
关键词
Livelihood; Rural development; Asset portfolio; Bi-temporal analysis; Kenya; Laikipia; HIGHLAND-LOWLAND SYSTEM; WATER-RESOURCES; VULNERABILITY; PERSPECTIVES; STRATEGIES; IMPACTS; AFRICA; MANAGEMENT; EDUCATION; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.02.003
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The rural population of semi-arid lands in Kenya face multiple challenges that result from population growth, poor markets, land use and climatic changes. In particular, subsistence oriented farmers face various risks and opportunities in their attempt to secure their livelihoods. This paper presents an analysis on how livelihood assets and strategies of smallholders in Laikipia County, Kenya, have changed within the last decade and discusses the implications for development interventions. The analysis is based on bi-temporal data from 170 semi-structured household interviews in 1997 and a follow-up survey of 30 households conducted in 2010. Well-being indicators were developed and livelihood portfolios compared. The results show a striking persistence in low asset endowment for the majority of smallholders from an aggregated perspective, whereas transitions into and out of better livelihood conditions become evident from a household perspective. The investment in, and accumulation of, conventional buffer or productive assets, such as grain stocks, livestock or land, does not shield households from adverse shocks and stresses as smallholders were shown to easily slip back into poverty. Household portfolios display particular constraints for smallholders in expanding natural resource related activities and a substantial decrease in livestock numbers. While off-farm activities could possibly increase well-being, the prevailing low income levels and high insecurity for the majority who are engaged in off-farm employment, limits the ability to increase livelihood assets in the area. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 251
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Addison T., 2009, Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
[2]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[3]   Social and ecological resilience: are they related? [J].
Adger, WN .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) :347-364
[4]  
Aeschbacher J, 2005, MT RES DEV, V25, P155, DOI 10.1659/0276-4741(2005)025[0155:RWSIAH]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ECOL SOC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 87 CHRON POV RES CTR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1992, IDS DISCUSSION PAPER
[10]   Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications [J].
Barrett, CB ;
Reardon, T ;
Webb, P .
FOOD POLICY, 2001, 26 (04) :315-331