Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the dragonfly genera Libellula, Ladona, and Plathemis (Odonata: Libellulidae) based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and 16S rRNA sequence data

被引:34
作者
Artiss, T
Schultz, TR
Polhemus, DA
Simon, C
机构
[1] Clark Univ, Dept Biol, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[2] Smithsonian Inst, Natl Museum Nat Hist, Dept Entomol, Washington, DC 20560 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Ecol & Evolut Biol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1006/mpev.2000.0867
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Molecular phylogenetic relationships among members: of the odonate genus Libellula (Odonata: Anisoptera: Libellulidae) were examined using 735 bp of mitochondrial COI and 416 bp of 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Considerable debate exists over several relationships within Libellula, as well over the status of two putative genera often placed as subgenera within Libellula: Ladona and Plathemis. Parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses of the separate and combined data sets indicate that Plathemis is basal and monophyletic and that Ladona is the sister clade to the remainder of Libellula sensu stricto (s.s.) (all. species within the genus Libellula, excluding Plathemis and Ladona). Moreover, two European taxa, Libellula fulva and L. depressa, were found to occupy a sister group relationship within the Ladona clade. Relationships within Libellula s.s. are less well resolved. However, monophyletic lineages within the genus are largely consistent with morphologically based subgeneric classifications. Although tree topologies from each analysis differed in some details, the differences were in no case statistically significant. The analysis of the combined COI and 16S data yielded trees with overall stronger support than analyses of either gene alone. Several analyses failed to support the monophyly of Libellula sensu late due to the inclusion df one or more outgroup species. However, statistical comparisons of topologies produced by unconstrained analyses and analyses in which the monophyly of Libellula was constrained indicate that any differences are nonsignificant. Based on morphological data, we therefore reject the paraphyly of Libellula and accept the outgroup status of Orthemis ferruginea and Pachydiplax longipennis. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 361
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
ALCOCK J, 1989, Odonatologica, V18, P89
[2]  
ALLEN D, 1985, SOC INT ODONATOL R S, V5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, TREATISE INVERTEBR R
[4]  
BENNEFIELD BILLY L., 1965, UNIV KANS SCI BULL, V45, P361
[5]  
Borror Donald J., 1945, ANN ENT SOC AMERICA, V38, P168
[6]  
BREMER K, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P795, DOI [10.2307/2408870, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x]
[7]  
BREMER K, 1994, CLADISTICS, V10, P295, DOI 10.1006/clad.1994.1019
[8]   PHYLOGENY OF HELICONIUS BUTTERFLIES INFERRED FROM MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA SEQUENCES (LEPIDOPTERA, NYMPHALIDAE) [J].
BROWER, AV .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 1994, 3 (02) :159-174
[9]   PARTITIONING AND COMBINING DATA IN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS [J].
BULL, JJ ;
HUELSENBECK, JP ;
CUNNINGHAM, CW ;
SWOFFORD, DL ;
WADDELL, PJ .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 1993, 42 (03) :384-397
[10]  
Byers C. F., 1930, University of Florida Publication Biological Science Series Gainesville, VNo.1