Current Guidelines Have Limited Applicability to Patients with Comorbid Conditions: A Systematic Analysis of Evidence-Based Guidelines

被引:152
作者
Lugtenberg, Marjolein [1 ,2 ]
Burgers, Jako S. [2 ,3 ]
Clancy, Carolyn [4 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ,2 ]
Schneider, Eric C. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Sci Ctr Care & Welf Tranzo, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare IQ Healthcare, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Coll Gen Practitioners NHG, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] AHRQ, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
MULTIPLE CHRONIC CONDITIONS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL GUIDELINES; CARE; HEALTH; PREVALENCE; RECOMMENDATIONS; DEPRESSION; DISEASES; ABSENCE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0025987
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学]; 070403 [天体物理学]; 070507 [自然资源与国土空间规划学]; 090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Background: Guidelines traditionally focus on the diagnosis and treatment of single diseases. As almost half of the patients with a chronic disease have more than one disease, the applicability of guidelines may be limited. The aim of this study was to assess the extent that guidelines address comorbidity and to assess the supporting evidence of recommendations related to comorbidity. Methodology/Principal Findings: We conducted a systematic analysis of evidence-based guidelines focusing on four highly prevalent chronic conditions with a high impact on quality of life: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type 2, and osteoarthritis. Data were abstracted from each guideline on the extent that comorbidity was addressed (general comments, specific recommendations), the type of comorbidity discussed (concordant, discordant), and the supporting evidence of the comorbidity-related recommendations (level of evidence, translation of evidence). Of the 20 guidelines, 17 (85%) addressed the issue of comorbidity and 14 (70%) provided specific recommendations on comorbidity. In general, the guidelines included few recommendations on patients with comorbidity (mean 3 recommendations per guideline, range 0 to 26). Of the 59 comorbidity-related recommendations provided, 46 (78%) addressed concordant comorbidities, 8 (14%) discordant comorbidities, and for 5 (8%) the type of comorbidity was not specified. The strength of the supporting evidence was moderate for 25% (15/59) and low for 37% (22/59) of the recommendations. In addition, for 73% (43/59) of the recommendations the evidence was not adequately translated into the guidelines. Conclusions/Significance: Our study showed that the applicability of current evidence-based guidelines to patients with comorbid conditions is limited. Most guidelines do not provide explicit guidance on treatment of patients with comorbidity, particularly for discordant combinations. Guidelines should be more explicit about the applicability of their recommendations to patients with comorbidity. Future clinical trials should also include patients with the most prevalent combinations of chronic conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - We need to report uncertain results and do it clearly [J].
Alderson, P .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7438) :476-477
[2]
Alonso J, 2004, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V109, P38
[3]
STATISTICS NOTES - ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF ABSENCE [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7003) :485-485
[4]
Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases - Implications for pay for performance [J].
Boyd, CM ;
Darer, J ;
Boult, C ;
Fried, LP ;
Boult, L ;
Wu, AW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (06) :716-724
[5]
Quality and Coordination of Care for Patients With Multiple Conditions: Results From an International Survey of Patient Experience [J].
Burgers, Jako S. ;
Voerman, Gerlienke E. ;
Grol, Richard ;
Faber, Marjan J. ;
Schneider, Eric C. .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2010, 33 (03) :343-364
[6]
Inside guidelines - Comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guide [J].
Burgers, JS ;
Bailey, JV ;
Klazinga, NS ;
Van der Bij, AK ;
Grol, R ;
Feder, G .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (11) :1933-1939
[7]
The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on daily functioning [J].
de Grauw, WJC ;
van de Lisdonk, EH ;
Behr, RRA ;
van Gerwen, WHEM ;
van den Hoogen, HJM ;
van Weel, C .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1999, 16 (02) :133-139
[8]
Multimorbidity's many challenges [J].
Fortin, Martin ;
Soubhi, Hassan ;
Hudon, Catherine ;
Bayliss, Elizabeth A. ;
van den Akker, Marjan .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7602) :1016-1017
[9]
Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review [J].
Francke, Anneke L. ;
Smit, Marieke C. ;
de Veer, Anke J. E. ;
Mistiaen, Patriek .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)
[10]
Improving the quality of medical care - Building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction [J].
Grol, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (20) :2578-2585