Collaborative reliability analysis under the framework of multidisciplinary systems design

被引:99
作者
Du, Xiaoping
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Rolla, MO 65401 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
reliability analysis; most probable point; multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO); collaborative design; uncertainty;
D O I
10.1023/B:OPTE.0000048537.35387.fa
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Traditional Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) generates deterministic optimal designs, which are frequently pushed to the limits of design constraint boundaries, leaving little or no room to accommodate uncertainties in system input, modeling, and simulation. As a result, the design solution obtained may be highly sensitive to the variations of system input which will lead to performance loss and the solution is often risky (high likelihood of undesired events). Reliability-based design is one of the alternative techniques for design under uncertainty. The natural method to perform reliability analysis in multidisciplinary systems is the all-in-one approach where the existing reliability analysis techniques are applied directly to the system-level multidisciplinary analysis. However, the all-in-one reliability analysis method requires a double loop procedure and therefore is generally very time consuming. To improve the efficiency of reliability analysis under the MDO framework, a collaborative reliability analysis method is proposed in this paper. The procedure of the traditional Most Probable Point (MPP) based reliability analysis method is combined with the collaborative disciplinary analyses to automatically satisfy the interdisciplinary consistency when conducting reliability analysis. As a result, only a single loop procedure is required and all the computations are conducted concurrently at the individual discipline-level. Compared with the existing reliability analysis methods in MDO, the proposed method is efficient and therefore provides a cheaper tool to evaluate design feasibility in MDO under uncertainty. Two examples are used for the purpose of verification.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 84
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alexandrov N.M., 2000, NASATM2000210104
[2]   AN ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING THE SYSTEM-LEVEL PROBLEM IN MULTILEVEL OPTIMIZATION [J].
BALLING, RJ ;
SOBIESZCZANSKISOBIESKI, J .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1995, 9 (3-4) :168-177
[3]  
BENNET JA, 1997, P ICASE NASA LANGL W, P13
[4]  
BRAUN RD, 1996, P 6 AIAA USAF NASA I
[5]  
DU X, 2001, IN PRESS AIAA J
[6]  
DU X, 2001, P 4 C STRUCT MULT OP
[7]   Towards a better understanding of modeling feasibility robustness in engineering design [J].
Du, XP ;
Chen, W .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2000, 122 (04) :385-394
[8]   Methodology for managing the effect of uncertainty in simulation-based design [J].
Du, XP ;
Chen, W .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2000, 38 (08) :1471-1478
[9]  
Du XQ., 2001, J. Des. Manuf. Autom., V4, P47, DOI [10.1080/ 15320370108500218, DOI 10.1080/15320370108500218]
[10]  
GU X, 1998, P 7 AIAA USAF NASA I, P309