The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future

被引:162
作者
Ebert, Jane E. J. [1 ]
Prelec, Drazen
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Dept Marketing & Logist, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] MIT, Alfred P Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
关键词
temporal discounting; hyperbolic discounting; intertemporal choice;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1060.0671
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We propose that the temporal dimension is fragile in that choices are insufficiently sensitive to it, and second, such sensitivity as exists is exceptionally malleable, unlike other dimensions such as money, which are attended by default. To test this, we axiomatize a "constant-sensitivity" discount function, and in four studies, we show that the degree of time-sensitivity is inadequate relative to the compound discounting norm, and strongly susceptible to manipulation. Time-sensitivity is increased by a comparative within-subject presentation (Experiment 1), direct instruction (Experiment 3), and provision of a visual cue for time duration (Experiment 4); time-sensitivity is decreased using a time pressure manipulation (Experiment 2). In each study, the sensitivity manipulation has an opposite effect on near-future and far-future valuations: Increased sensitivity decreases discounting in the near future and increases discounting in the far future. In contrast, such sensitivity manipulations have little effect on the money dimension.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1438
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Pragmatic use of categorical information in impression formation [J].
Abele, AE ;
Petzold, P .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (02) :347-358
[2]  
Ainslie G., 2001, Breakdown of Will
[3]  
Ainslie G., 1992, CHOICE TIME, P57
[4]  
Ainslie G., 1983, ETIOLOGIC ASPECTS AL, P119
[5]   Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure [J].
Alessi, SM ;
Petry, NM .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2003, 64 (03) :345-354
[6]  
[Anonymous], DUAL PROCESS THEORIE
[7]  
[Anonymous], J PERS SOC PSYCHOL
[8]   When does duration matter in judgment and decision making? [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2000, 129 (04) :508-523
[9]   Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review [J].
Block, RA ;
Zakay, D .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (02) :184-197
[10]   Time preferences and preventive health behavior: Acceptance of the influenza vaccine [J].
Chapman, GB ;
Coups, EJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (03) :307-314