Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit

被引:169
作者
Keegan, Mark T. [2 ]
Gajic, Ognjen [3 ]
Afessa, Bekele [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Anesthesiol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Crit Care, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
APACHE; benchmarking; critical care; intensive care unit; mortality; outcome assessment; statistical models; ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY SCORE; MORTALITY PROBABILITY-MODELS; POTENTIALLY INEFFECTIVE CARE; CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION; ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; III PROGNOSTIC SYSTEM; 3 ADMISSION SCORE; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; SAPS-II;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Adult intensive care unit prognostic models have been used for predicting patient outcome for three decades. The goal of this review is to describe the different versions of the main adult intensive care unit prognostic models and discuss their potential roles. Data Source: PubMed search and review of the relevant medical literature. Summary: The main prognostic models for assessing the overall severity of illness in critically ill adults are Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, and Mortality Probability Model. Simplified Acute Physiology Score and Mortality Probability Model have been updated to their third versions and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation to its fourth version. The development of prognostic models is usually followed by internal and external validation and performance assessment. Performance is assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for discrimination and Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic for calibration. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV, and Mortality Probability Model(0) III were 0.85, 0.88, and 0.82, respectively, and all these three fourth-generation models had good calibration. The models have been extensively used for case-mix adjustment in clinical research and epidemiology, but their role in benchmarking, performance improvement, resource use, and clinical decision support has been less well studied. Conclusions: The fourth-generation Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV, and Mortality Probability Model0 III adult prognostic models, perform well in predicting mortality. Future studies are needed to determine their roles for benchmarking, performance improvement, resource use, and clinical decision support. (Crit Care Med 2011; 39:163-169)
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]   Drotrecogin alfa (activated) for adults with severe sepsis and a low risk of death [J].
Abraham, E ;
Laterre, P ;
Garg, R ;
Levy, H ;
Talwar, D ;
Trzaskoma, BL ;
Francois, B ;
Guy, JS ;
Bruckmann, M ;
Rea-Neto, A ;
Rossaint, R ;
Perrotin, D ;
Sablotzki, A ;
Arkins, N ;
Utterback, BG ;
Macias, WL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (13) :1332-1341
[2]   The influence of missing components of the Acute Physiology Score of APACHE III on the measurement of ICU performance [J].
Afessa, B ;
Keegan, MT ;
Gajic, O ;
Hubmayr, RD ;
Peters, SG .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 31 (11) :1537-1543
[3]   Evaluating the performance of an institution using an intensive care unit benchmark [J].
Afessa, B ;
Keegan, MT ;
Hubmayr, RD ;
Naessens, JM ;
Gajic, C ;
Long, KH ;
Peters, SG .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 80 (02) :174-180
[4]   Identifying potentially ineffective care in the sickest critically ill patients on the third ICU day [J].
Afessa, B ;
Keegan, MT ;
Mohammad, Z ;
Finkielman, JD ;
Peters, SG .
CHEST, 2004, 126 (06) :1905-1909
[5]   Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units [J].
Afessa, Bekele ;
Gajic, Ognjen ;
Keegan, Mark T. .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2007, 23 (03) :639-+
[6]   Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1432-1435
[7]  
[Anonymous], 100 Top Hospitals: ICU Benchmarks for Success 2000
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, WILEY PS TX, DOI 10.1002/0471722146
[9]  
Beck DH, 2002, ANAESTHESIA, V57, P785
[10]   Waiting for the break of dawn? The effects of discharge time, discharge TISS scores and discharge facility on hospital mortality after intensive care [J].
Beck, DH ;
McQuillan, P ;
Smith, GB .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (09) :1287-1293