Humane issues surrounding decapitation reconsidered

被引:7
作者
Bates, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilson Coll, Dept Vet Med Technol, Chambersburg, PA 17201 USA
来源
JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2010年 / 237卷 / 09期
关键词
HALOTHANE-ANESTHETIZED CALVES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC RESPONSES; SLAUGHTER; CASTRATION; EEG; AGE;
D O I
10.2460/javma.237.9.1024
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
090604 [动物药学];
摘要
Despite all of the contradictory statements and competing opinions existing in the literature, these facts stand out: • Severing the spinal cord and the tissues immediately surrounding it is likely painful.8,17,36 • Decapitation induces desynchronization of the EEG pattern (ie, conversion of HVSA to LVFA).1,17-20 • The LVFA pattern is most consistent with a state of conscious awareness.10,15,16 • Various noxious stimuli applied to animals in experimental settings induce desynchronization of the EEG pattern; the use of local anesthetics prior to the trauma can block desynchronization.22,27,28,30-32 • The LVFA pattern seen in the brains of endothermic animals following decapitation can persist for anywhere from 8 to 29 seconds. 1,17-20 • No new data have been published to demonstrate that decapitated animals do not potentially experience persistent consciousness. Viewed in toto, the almost inescapable conclusion from these facts is that decapitation is a painful procedure and that conscious awareness may persist for up to 29 seconds in the disembodied heads. This comports poorly with the strict definition of euthanasia. Not addressed here is the fear or mental distress that would plausibly accompany sudden severe pain and loss of motor control following decapitation. Moreover, all of the preceding has presupposed flawless execution of the decapitation procedure. As Carbone12 tellingly notes, that cannot be assumed to occur in every instance, especially where small, squirming, difficult-to-position animals are involved; mistakes resulting in serious mutilations and additional discomfort will occasionally happen. Although the science is still not definitive on what exactly transpires inside the brains of decapitated animals (and may be inherently unknowable), common decency dictates that where the strong possibility exists of inflicting great suffering, animals are entitled to the benefit of the doubt. That principle in conjunction with recent research findings bearing on animal euthanasia should animate and inform the decisions made by veterinarians serving on institutional animal care and use committees as well as by the expert panel currently reviewing the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1026
页数:3
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
IS EUTHANASIA OF RATS BY DECAPITATION INHUMANE [J].
ALLRED, JB ;
BERNTSON, GG .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1986, 116 (09) :1859-1861
[2]
[Anonymous], 2000, J AM VET MED ASS
[3]
*AVMA, 1993, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V202, P229
[4]
Carbone L, 2004, WHAT ANIMALS WANT EX, P186
[5]
[6]
Cartner SC, 2007, COMPARATIVE MED, V57, P570
[7]
CUNNINGHAM DJC, 1964, OXYGEN ANIMAL ORGANI, P277
[8]
PAIN PERCEPTION IN DECAPITATED RAT-BRAIN [J].
DERR, RF .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1991, 49 (19) :1399-1402
[9]
Validation of the acute electroencephalographic responses of calves to noxious stimulus with scoop dehorning [J].
Gibson, T. J. ;
Johnson, C. B. ;
Stafford, K. J. ;
Mitchinson, S. L. ;
Mellor, D. J. .
NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2007, 55 (04) :152-157
[10]
Electroencephalographic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning [J].
Gibson, T. J. ;
Johnson, C. B. ;
Murrell, J. C. ;
Hulls, C. M. ;
Mitchinson, S. L. ;
Stafford, K. J. ;
Johnstone, A. C. ;
Mellor, D. J. .
NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 57 (02) :77-83