FE analysis of geometry effects of an artificial bird striking an aeroengine fan blade

被引:145
作者
Meguid, S. A. [1 ]
Mao, R. H. [1 ]
Ng, T. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Div Aerosp Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
bird strike; artificial bird configuration; aspect ratio; rigid panel; flexible fan blade;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.008
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 [机械工程];
摘要
Bird strike resistance of aeroengines is a strict certification requirement. Apart from costly experimental bird strike tests, explicit numerical modeling techniques have been employed. However, due to the complicated bird geometry, artificial bird models are still not well defined and it is a perennial problem selecting an appropriate representative artificial bird geometry for the simulations. To examine the relative effects of the artificial bird geometry, explicit 3-D finite element analyses are conducted herein using the commercial code LS-DYNA. As a validation test, we first studied the nonlinear transient dynamic response of an artificial bird striking a rigid flat target. Following the validation, we studied the impact behavior of an artificial bird impinging a flexible aeroengine fan blade. The study focused on the three most-frequently used configurations in the literature: namely, hemispherical-ended cylinder, straight-ended cylinder, and ellipsoid, at various length-to-diameter aspect ratios. The results show that the initial contact area between the bird and target in the early phase of the impact event would have a significant effect on the peak impact force. The aspect ratio of the bird striking both rigid panel and flexible fan blade was found to have little influence on the normalized impact force and impulse. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 498
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses [J].
Airoldi, A ;
Cacchione, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2006, 32 (10) :1651-1677
[2]
Allan JR, 2002, HUMAN CONFLICTS WILD, P147
[3]
[Anonymous], 1993, Structural Crashworthiness and Failure
[4]
Barber J.P., 1978, AFFDLTR7760 U DAYT R
[5]
BOWMAN DR, 2004, F7082004 ASTM
[6]
Brockman R.A., 1991, WLTR913006 U DAYT RE
[7]
CHEN W, 2003, ACTA AERONAUT ASTRON, V24, P532
[8]
Deping G, 1990, J AEROSPACE POWER, V5, P335
[9]
EDGE CH, 1999, P BIRD STRIKE
[10]
Federal Aviation Administration, 1984, FED AV REG 33