Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness

被引:233
作者
Dauber, J
Hirsch, M
Simmering, D
Waldhardt, R
Otte, A
Wolters, V
机构
[1] Univ Giessen, Dept Anim Ecol, IFZ, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
[2] Univ Giessen, Div Landscape Ecol & Landscape Planning, IFZ, D-35392 Giessen, Germany
关键词
apoidea; formicidae; plants; matrix; conservation management; agricultural landscape;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00092-6
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Sustainable conservation management in cultivated landscapes urgently needs indicators that provide quantitative links between landscape patterns and biodiversity. As a contribution to this aim, the influence of the matrix surrounding managed grassland sites on species richness of ants, wild bees and vascular plants was investigated at two different scales (50 and 200 m radius). In addition, patch variables describing habitat quality were included in the analyses. Species richness of the three taxa was not significantly inter-correlated. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed significant predictor variables for the species richness of the different taxa at both matrix scales. The variation of the matrix radius had no impact on the variance explanation of the regression models. The degree of variance explained by the regression models varied between taxa (bees > plants > ants). Moreover, the predictive variables were different for the taxa, with the regression model for wild bees including both patch and matrix variables, that for plants richness including patch variables only, and that for ants including matrix variables only. We conclude that landscape diversity and percentage cover of certain land-use types might serve as useful indicators for species richness at the landscape scale. However, the specific response patterns revealed in our study suggest that a variety of taxa must be included in this type of approach. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 329
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN AN, 1991, ANT - PLANT INTERACTIONS, P539
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J APPL ECOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, AUSBREITUNGSBIOLOGIE
[4]   Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Humphries, CJ ;
Densham, PJ ;
Lampinen, R ;
Hagemeijer, WJM ;
Mitchell-Jones, AJ ;
Gasc, JP .
ECOGRAPHY, 2001, 24 (01) :103-110
[5]   BIODIVERSITY DYNAMICS - FROM POPULATION AND COMMUNITY ECOLOGY APPROACHES TO A LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY POINT-OF-VIEW [J].
BARBAULT, R .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1995, 31 (1-3) :89-98
[6]   A holistic landscape ecological study of the interactions between farming activities and ecological patterns in Brittany, France [J].
Baudry, J ;
Burel, F ;
Thenail, C ;
Le Coeur, D .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2000, 50 (1-3) :119-128
[7]   The effects of land use on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in the Argentine Chaco [J].
Bestelmeyer, BT ;
Wiens, JA .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :1225-1240
[8]  
BROSIUS G, 1988, SPSS PC BASICS GRAPH
[9]   Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes [J].
Burel, F ;
Baudry, J ;
Butet, A ;
Clergeau, P ;
Delettre, Y ;
Le Coeur, D ;
Dubs, F ;
Morvan, N ;
Paillat, G ;
Petit, S ;
Thenail, C ;
Brunel, E ;
Lefeuvre, JC .
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1998, 19 (01) :47-60
[10]  
CANE JH, 1991, J KANSAS ENTOMOL SOC, V64, P406