Invasive cervical carcinoma: Role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up - Cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis

被引:124
作者
Hricak, H [1 ]
Powell, CB [1 ]
Yu, KK [1 ]
Washington, E [1 ]
Subak, LL [1 ]
Stern, JL [1 ]
Cisternas, MG [1 ]
Arenson, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT OBSTET GYNECOL & REPROD SCI,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
cost-effectiveness; economics; medical; efficacy study; uterine neoplasms; CT; diagnosis; MR;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596840
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To examine the cost and efficacy of diagnostic work-up in patients with invasive cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 246 patients with invasive cervical cancer, all diagnostic tests performed before treatment were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the initial study (n = 105) and those who did not (n = 141). A list of 1995 Medicare global payments was used to measure cost. Bayesian analysis (likelihood ratios derived from a literature search) was performed for bladder, rectal, parametrial, and nodal involvement in stage Ib disease. RESULTS: Significantly fewer procedures and fewer invasive studies were performed in the MR imaging group. Net cost savings for the MR imaging group was $401 for all patients and $449 for patients with stage Ib disease. For stage Ib disease, the 0% pretest probability of bladder or rectal invasion does not justify the routine use of barium enema examination, cystoscopy, or proctoscopy. The increase in predictive values for parametrial and nodal disease was highest for MR imaging when tumor size was at least 2 cm. CONCLUSION: Guidelines for the pretreatment work-up of clinical stage Ib cervical cancer need revision. MR imaging should be used as an adjunct to clinical evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 409
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
AVERETTE H E, 1975, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, V18, P215, DOI 10.1097/00003081-197509000-00023
[2]  
BRENNER DE, 1982, CANCER, V50, P2323, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19821201)50:11<2323::AID-CNCR2820501117>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]  
BURGHARDT E, 1978, OBSTET GYNECOL, V52, P138
[5]  
BURGHARDT E, 1993, SURGICAL GYNECOLOGIC
[6]   PREDICTIVE VALUE OF COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE PRESURGICAL EVALUATION OF PRIMARY-CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
CAMILIEN, L ;
GORDON, D ;
FRUCHTER, RG ;
MAIMAN, M ;
BOYCE, JG .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1988, 30 (02) :209-215
[7]  
CHUNG CK, 1981, GYNECOL ONCOL, V12, P348, DOI 10.1016/0090-8258(81)90135-9
[8]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND ENDOSONOGRAPHY IN THE LOCAL STAGING OF CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX [J].
COBBY, M ;
BROWNING, J ;
JONES, A ;
WHIPP, E ;
GODDARD, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (753) :673-679
[9]   V-FACTOR (TUMOR VOLUME) AND T-FACTOR (FIGO CLASSIFICATION) IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CERVIX CANCER PROGNOSIS - THE RISK OF LYMPH-NODE SPREAD [J].
DARGENT, D ;
FROBERT, JL ;
BEAU, G .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1985, 22 (01) :15-22
[10]   PROSPECTIVE SURGICAL PATHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF DISEASE-FREE INTERVAL IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE IB SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX - A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY [J].
DELGADO, G ;
BUNDY, B ;
ZAINO, R ;
SEVIN, BU ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
MAJOR, F .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (03) :352-357