The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials

被引:433
作者
Kim, A [1 ]
Osterhout, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
syntax; semantics; thematic roles; ERPs; sentence processing; N400; P600;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2004.10.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants read sentences, some of which contained an anomalous word. In the critical sentences (e.g., The meal was devouring...), the syntactic cues unambiguously signaled an Agent interpretation of the subject noun, whereas the semantic cues supported a Theme interpretation. An Agent interpretation would render the main verb semantically anomalous (as meals do not devour things). Conversely, the Theme interpretation would render the main verb syntactically anomalous (as the -ED form, not the -ING form, is syntactically appropriate for this interpretation). We report that the main verbs in such sentences elicit the P600 effect associated with syntactic anomalies, rather than the N400 effect associated with semantic anomalies. We conclude that, at least under certain conditions, semantic information is "in control" of how words are combined during sentence processing. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 225
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study [J].
Allen, M ;
Badecker, W ;
Osterhout, L .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2003, 18 (04) :405-430
[2]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[3]   Ambiguity in sentence processing [J].
Altmann, GTM .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (04) :146-152
[4]   Thematic role assignment in context [J].
Altmann, GTM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (01) :124-145
[5]   Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference [J].
Altmann, GTM ;
Kamide, Y .
COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) :247-264
[6]  
Bever T. G., 1970, Cognition and the development of language, P279, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199677139.003.0001
[7]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806
[8]   The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension [J].
Boland, JE .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (04) :423-484
[9]   INTERACTION OF VERB SELECTIONAL RESTRICTIONS, NOUN ANIMACY AND SYNTACTIC FORM IN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
CAPLAN, D ;
HILDEBRANDT, N ;
WATERS, GS .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1994, 9 (04) :549-585
[10]   DISSOCIATION OF ALGORITHMIC AND HEURISTIC PROCESSES IN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION - EVIDENCE FROM APHASIA [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
ZURIF, EB .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1976, 3 (04) :572-582