Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology - Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America

被引:118
作者
Aiken, Leona S. [1 ]
West, Stephen G. [1 ]
Millsap, Roger E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
quantitative curriculum; training; statistics; research design; measurement;
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.32
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In a survey of all PhD programs in psychology in the United States and Canada, the authors documented the quantitative methodology curriculum (statistics, measurement, and research design) to examine the extent to which innovations in quantitative methodology have diffused into the training of PhDs in psychology. In all, 201 psychology PhD programs (86%) participated. This survey replicated and extended a previous survey (L. S. Aiken, S. G. West, L. B. Sechrest, & R. R. Reno, 1990), permitting examination of curriculum development. Most training supported laboratory and not field research. The median of 1.6 years of training in statistics and measurement was mainly devoted to the modally 1-year introductory statistics course, leaving little room for advanced study. Curricular enhancements were noted in statistics and to a minor degree in measurement. Additional coverage of both fundamental and innovative quantitative methodology is needed. The research design curriculum has largely stagnated, a cause for great concern. Elite programs showed no overall advantage in quantitative training. Forces that support curricular innovation are characterized. Human capital challenges to quantitative training, including recruiting and supporting young,quantitative faculty, are discussed. Steps must be taken to bring innovations in quantitative methodology into the curriculum of PhD programs in psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 50
页数:19
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   GRADUATE TRAINING IN STATISTICS, METHODOLOGY, AND MEASUREMENT IN PSYCHOLOGY - A SURVEY OF PHD PROGRAMS IN NORTH-AMERICA [J].
AIKEN, LS ;
WEST, SG ;
SECHREST, L ;
RENO, RR ;
ROEDIGER, HL ;
SCARR, S ;
KAZDIN, AE ;
SHERMAN, SJ .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (06) :721-734
[2]  
Allison PD, 2010, HANDBOOK OF SURVEY RESEARCH, 2ND EDITION, P631
[3]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1997, GRAD STUD PSYCH 1997
[4]  
*AM PSYCH ASS TASK, 2007, TASK FORC INCR QUANT
[5]  
*AM STAT ASS, 2007, GRAD PROF CONT ED
[6]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SPSS 11 0 GUIDE DATA
[8]   A broader template for analyzing broken randomized experiments [J].
Barnard, J ;
Du, JT ;
Hill, JL ;
Rubin, DB .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1998, 27 (02) :285-317
[9]  
Bentler P.M., 1985, THEORY IMPLEMENTATIO
[10]  
Bentler PeterM., 1995, EQS PROGRAM MANUAL