Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation

被引:243
作者
Isaacs, RE [1 ]
Podichetty, VK
Santiago, P
Sandhu, FA
Spears, J
Kelly, K
Rice, L
Fessler, RG
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida Spine Inst, Weston, ACT, Australia
[3] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Sect Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Missouri Spine Inst, Jefferson City, MO USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; fusion; interbody fusion; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion;
D O I
10.3171/spi.2005.3.2.0098
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The authors have developed a novel technique for percutaneous fusion in which standard microendoscopic discectomy is modified. Based on data obtained in their cadaveric studies they considered that this minimally invasive interbody fusion could be safely implemented clinically. The authors describe their initial experience with a microendoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (METLIF) technique, with regard to safety in the placement of percutaneous instrumentation, perioperative morbidity, and early postoperative results. Methods. The METLIF procedure was performed unilaterally in 20 patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis or pure mechanical back pain with endoscopic assistance, hemilaminectomy, unilateral facetectomy, and microdiscectomy. Two interbody grafts were placed via the lateral exposure of the disc space. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws were then inserted. Compared with patients who had undergone single-level posterior LIF at the same institutions, intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and postoperative narcotic agent use were significantly lower in the METLIF group. The mean LOS for the percutaneous fusion group was 3.4 days (5.1 days in those who underwent PLIF; p < 0.02). There have been no procedure-related complications in this series to date. Conclusions. The METLIF technique provided an option for percutaneous interbody fusion similar to that in open surgery while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique was safe and exhibited a trend toward decreased intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, total narcotic use, and the risk of transfusion.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 105
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
ARAI T, 2002, J ORTHOP SURG HONG K, V10, P1
[2]
Branch ChL, 1989, LUMBAR INTERBODY FUS, P211
[3]
Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system - Two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial [J].
Brantigan, JW ;
Steffee, AD ;
Lewis, ML ;
Quinn, LM ;
Persenaire, JM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1437-1446
[4]
CLOWARD RB, 1981, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P74
[6]
Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device [J].
Elias, WJ ;
Simmons, NE ;
Kaptain, GJ ;
Chadduck, JB ;
Whitehill, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 93 (01) :45-52
[7]
Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery -: A comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients [J].
Escobar, E ;
Transfeldt, E ;
Garvey, T ;
Ogilvie, J ;
Graber, J ;
Schultz, L .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (07) :729-732
[8]
Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: An initial clinical experience [J].
Fessler, RG ;
Khoo, LT .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) :S37-S45
[9]
Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results [J].
Foley, KT ;
Gupta, SK .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (01) :7-12
[10]
Interbody, posterior, and combined lumbar fusions [J].
Fraser, RD .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (24) :S167-S177