Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: Development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics

被引:213
作者
Hukkelhoven, CWPM
Steyerberg, EW
Habbema, JDF
Farace, E
Marmarou, A
Murray, GD
Marshall, LF
Maas, AIR
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurol Surg, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Clin Decis Sci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Virginia, Dept Neurol Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[6] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Neurol Surg, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
Glasgow Outcome Scale; mortality; prognosis; statistical models; traumatic brain injury; validation studies;
D O I
10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The early prediction of outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important for several purposes, but no prognostic models have yet been developed with proven generalizability across different settings. The objective of this study was to develop and validate prognostic models that use information available at admission to estimate 6-month outcome after severe or moderate TBI. To this end, this study evaluated mortality and unfavorable outcome, that is, death, and vegetative or severe disability on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), at 6 months post-injury. Prospectively collected data on 2269 patients from two multi-center clinical trials were used to develop prognostic models for each outcome with logistic regression analysis. We included seven predictive characteristics-age, motor score, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, computed tomography classification, and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The models were validated internally with bootstrapping techniques. External validity was determined in prospectively collected data from two relatively unselected surveys in Europe (n = 796) and in North America (n = 746). We evaluated the discriminative ability, that is, the ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Further, we determined calibration, that is, agreement between predicted and observed outcome, with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The models discriminated well in the development population (AUC 0.78-0.80). External validity was even better (AUC 0.83-0.89). Calibration was less satisfactory, with poor external validity in the North American survey (p < 0.001). Especially, observed risks were higher than predicted for poor prognosis patients. A score chart was derived from the regression models to facilitate clinical application. Relatively simple prognostic models using baseline characteristics can accurately predict 6-month outcome in patients with severe or moderate TBI. The high discriminative ability indicates the potential of this model for classifying patients according to prognostic risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1039
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression
    Andrews, PJD
    Sleeman, DH
    Statham, PFX
    McQuatt, A
    Corruble, V
    Jones, PA
    Howells, TP
    Macmillan, CSA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 97 (02) : 326 - 336
  • [2] Baltas I, 1998, J Neurosurg Sci, V42, P85
  • [3] COMPUTER-ASSISTED PREDICTION OF OUTCOME OF SEVERELY HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS
    BARLOW, P
    TEASDALE, G
    JENNETT, B
    MURRAY, L
    DUFF, C
    MURRAY, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROCOMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 1984, 7 (3-4): : 271 - 277
  • [4] SYSTEMATIC SELECTION OF PROGNOSTIC FEATURES IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    BRAAKMAN, R
    GELPKE, GJ
    HABBEMA, JDF
    MAAS, AIR
    MINDERHOUD, JM
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1980, 6 (04) : 362 - 370
  • [5] Variation among trauma centers' calculation of Glasgow Coma Scale score: Results of a national survey
    Buechler, CM
    Blostein, PA
    Koestner, A
    Hurt, K
    Schaars, M
    McKernan, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1998, 45 (03): : 429 - 431
  • [6] Bullock RM, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P449
  • [7] Selection of thrombolytic therapy for individual patients: Development of a clinical model
    Califf, RM
    Woodlief, LH
    Harrell, FE
    Lee, KL
    White, HD
    Guerci, A
    Barbash, GI
    Simes, RJ
    Weaver, WDD
    Simoons, ML
    Topol, EJ
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 133 (06) : 630 - 639
  • [8] Chesnut RM, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P555
  • [9] CHART FOR OUTCOME PREDICTION IN SEVERE HEAD-INJURY
    CHOI, SC
    WARD, JD
    BECKER, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1983, 59 (02) : 294 - 297
  • [10] PREDICTION TREE FOR SEVERELY HEAD-INJURED PATIENTS
    CHOI, SC
    MUIZELAAR, JP
    BARNES, TY
    MARMAROU, A
    BROOKS, DM
    YOUNG, HF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 75 (02) : 251 - 255