Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia

被引:64
作者
Kang, David C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Int Relat, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] USC, Korean Studies Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
CHINA; SOVEREIGNTY; AUTHORITY; SOCIETY; WORLD; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/09636412.2010.524079
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The East Asian otribute systemo from 1368 to 1841 comprised an enduring, stable, and hierarchic system, with China clearly the hegemon, in which cultural achievement was as important as economic or military prowess. Most significant is the recognition that the Chinese tributary order was in fact a viable and recognized international system with military, cultural, and economic dimensions that all intersected to create a very interesting and stable security system. Recently it has become fashionable in historical circles to question the viability of the tributary system in part because scholars have become increasingly aware of the realties behind Chinese rhetoric. However, more nuanced studies and new interpretations only serve to underscore the centrality of the system for its participants. This paper demonstrates that there is a hierarchical relationshipgenerated by a common culture defined by a Confucian worldviewin place in the context of China and the East Asian states and helps clarify the distinction between an international system based on polarity and an international society based on culture.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 622
页数:32
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CAMBRIDGE HIST JAPAN
[2]  
Arrighi G, 2003, NEW LEFT REV, P5
[3]  
Barfield ThomasJ., 1989, PERILOUS FRONTIER NO
[4]  
Batten BruceL., 2003, ENDS JAPAN PREMODERN
[5]   Toward a comparative history of borderlands [J].
Baud, M ;
vanSchendel, W .
JOURNAL OF WORLD HISTORY, 1997, 8 (02) :211-242
[6]   FROM INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM TO INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY - STRUCTURAL REALISM AND REGIME THEORY MEET THE ENGLISH SCHOOL [J].
BUZAN, B .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1993, 47 (03) :327-352
[7]  
CHEGA P, 2006, SOURCEBOOK KOREAN CI, V2, P87
[8]  
Clark Ian, 2009, ENGLISH SCH TH UNPUB
[9]  
Clark Ian, 2009, HIERARCHICAL C UNPUB, P6
[10]   The paradox of hegemony: America's ambiguous relationship with the United Nations [J].
Cronin, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2001, 7 (01) :103-130