The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities

被引:3499
作者
Genheden, Samuel [1 ]
Ryde, Ulf [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Chem, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Lund Univ, Ctr Chem, Dept Theoret Chem, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
drug design; electrostatics; entropy; free energy perturbation; linear interaction energy; non-polar solvation; solvation; FREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; BOLTZMANN SURFACE-AREA; CONTINUUM SOLVATION MODELS; GB/SA SCORING PROCEDURE; MM-PBSA; THERMODYNAMIC INTEGRATION; THEOPHYLLINE BINDING; ACCURATE PREDICTIONS; BLIND PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Introduction: The molecular mechanics energies combined with the Poisson-Boltzmann or generalized Born and surface area continuum solvation (MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA) methods are popular approaches to estimate the free energy of the binding of small ligands to biological macromolecules. They are typically based on molecular dynamics simulations of the receptor-ligand complex and are therefore intermediate in both accuracy and computational effort between empirical scoring and strict alchemical perturbation methods. They have been applied to a large number of systems with varying success. Areas covered: The authors review the use of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to calculate ligand-binding affinities, with an emphasis on calibration, testing and validation, as well as attempts to improve the methods, rather than on specific applications. Expert opinion: MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA are attractive approaches owing to their modular nature and that they do not require calculations on a training set. They have been used successfully to reproduce and rationalize experimental findings and to improve the results of virtual screening and docking. However, they contain several crude and questionable approximations, for example, the lack of conformational entropy and information about the number and free energy of water molecules in the binding site. Moreover, there are many variants of the method and their performance varies strongly with the tested system. Likewise, most attempts to ameliorate the methods with more accurate approaches, for example, quantum-mechanical calculations, polarizable force fields or improved solvation have deteriorated the results.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 461
页数:13
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]   Contribution of Explicit Solvent Effects to the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Inhibitors in Blood Coagulation Factor Serine Proteases [J].
Abel, Robert ;
Salam, Noeris K. ;
Shelley, John ;
Farid, Ramy ;
Friesner, Richard A. ;
Sherman, Woody .
CHEMMEDCHEM, 2011, 6 (06) :1049-1066
[2]   Improved Ligand Binding Energies Derived from Molecular Dynamics: Replicate Sampling Enhances the Search of Conformational Space [J].
Adler, Marc ;
Beroza, Paul .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2013, 53 (08) :2065-2072
[3]   Quantum Mechanical Binding Free Energy Calculation for Phosphopeptide Inhibitors of the Lck SH2 Domain [J].
Anisimov, Victor M. ;
Cavasotto, Claudio N. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 32 (10) :2254-2263
[4]   NEW METHOD FOR PREDICTING BINDING-AFFINITY IN COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN [J].
AQVIST, J ;
MEDINA, C ;
SAMUELSSON, JE .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (03) :385-391
[5]   How accurate can molecular dynamics/linear response and Poisson-Boltzmann/solvent accessible surface calculations be for predicting relative binding affinities?: Acetylcholinesterase huprine inhibitors as a test case [J].
Barril, X ;
Gelpí, JL ;
López, JM ;
Orozco, M ;
Luque, FJ .
THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS, 2001, 106 (1-2) :2-9
[6]  
Beà I, 2001, COMB CHEM HIGH T SCR, V4, P605
[7]   Evaluating the accuracy of the quasiharmonic approximation [J].
Chang, CE ;
Chen, W ;
Gilson, MK .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 1 (05) :1017-1028
[8]   Assessment of solvation effects on calculated binding affinity differences: Trypsin inhibition by flavonoids as a model system for congeneric series. [J].
Checa, A ;
Ortiz, AR ;
dePascualTeresa, B ;
Gago, F .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 40 (25) :4136-4145
[9]   A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B [J].
Ciancetta, Antonella ;
Genheden, Samuel ;
Ryde, Ulf .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2011, 25 (08) :729-742
[10]   Molecular dynamics simulations of the TEM-1,β-lactamase complexed with cephalothin [J].
Díaz, N ;
Suárez, D ;
Merz, KM ;
Sordo, TL .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (03) :780-791