Gallbladder cancer a comprehensive review

被引:50
作者
Lai, Eric C. H. [1 ]
Lau, W. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Surg, Prince Wales Hosp, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND | 2008年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
gallbladder cancer; gallbladder neoplasm; cholecystectomy; hepatectomy; survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Gallbladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer involving the gastrointestinal tract, but it is the most common malignant turnout of the biliary tract worldwide. The percentage of patients diagnosed to have gallbladder cancer after simple cholecystectomy for presumed gallbladder stone disease is 0.5-1.5%. This turnout is traditionally regarded as a highly lethal disease with an overall 5-year survival of less than 5%. The marked improvement in the outcome of patients with gallbladder cancer in the last decade is because of the aggressive radical surgical approach that has been adopted, and improvements in surgical techniques and peri-operative care. This article aims to review the current approach to the management of gallbladder cancer. Methods: A Medline, PubMed database search was performed to identify articles published from 1990 to 2007 using the keywords 'carcinoma of gallbladder', 'gallbladder cancer', 'gallbladder neoplasm' and 'cholecystectomy'. Results and conclusions: The overall 5-year survival for patients with gallbladder cancer who underwent Ro curative resection was reported to range from 21% to 69%. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is absolutely contraindicated when gallbladder cancer is known or suspected pre-operatively. Patients with a pre-operative suspicion of gallbladder cancer should undergo open exploration and cholecystectomy after proper pre-operative assessment. For patients whose cancer is an incidental finding on pathological review, a second radical resection is indicated except for Tis and Tia disease. There is still controversy for the optimal management of Tib disease. Although the role of surgery for advanced disease remains controversial, patients with advanced gallbladder cancer can benefit from radical resection, provided a potentially curative Ro resection is possible. There is still no effective adjuvant therapy for gallbladder cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 110
页数:10
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]
Laparoscopic staging in gallbladder cancer [J].
Agrawal, S ;
Sonawane, RN ;
Behari, A ;
Kumar, A ;
Sikora, SS ;
Saxena, R ;
Kapoor, VK .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 22 (06) :440-445
[2]
Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in advanced biliary tract and gallbladder carcinoma - A north central cancer treatment group phase II trial [J].
Alberts, SR ;
Al-Khatib, H ;
Mahoney, MR ;
Burgart, L ;
Cera, PJ ;
Flynn, PJ ;
Flynn, PJ ;
Finch, TR ;
Levitt, R ;
Windschitl, HE ;
Knost, JA ;
Tschetter, LK .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (01) :111-118
[3]
Indications for pancreatoduodenectomy in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for advanced gallbladder carcinoma [J].
Araida, T ;
Yoshikawa, T ;
Azuma, T ;
Ota, T ;
Takasaki, K ;
Hanyu, F .
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2004, 11 (01) :45-49
[4]
Predictors of long-term survival in patients with gallbladder cancer [J].
Balachandran, Palat ;
Agarwal, Shalen ;
Krishnani, Narendra ;
Pandey, Chandra M. ;
Kumar, Ashok ;
Sikora, Sadiq S. ;
Saxena, Rajan ;
Kapoor, Vinay K. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (06) :848-854
[5]
Changing patterns of gallbladder carcinoma in New Mexico [J].
Barakat, J ;
Dunkelberg, JC ;
Ma, TY .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (02) :434-440
[6]
Bartlett DL, 2000, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V19, P145, DOI 10.1002/1098-2388(200009)19:2<145::AID-SSU7>3.0.CO
[7]
2-6
[8]
Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer - Implications for staging and management [J].
Bartlett, DL ;
Fong, YM ;
Fortner, JG ;
Brennan, MF ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (05) :639-646
[9]
BARTLETT DL, 2000, DIS LIVER BILIARY TR, P993
[10]
Long-term results after curative resection for carcinoma of the gallbladder [J].
Benoist, S ;
Panis, Y ;
Fagniez, PL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (02) :118-122