Barriers to Australian physicians' and paediatricians' involvement in randomised controlled trials

被引:14
作者
Caldwell, PHY
Craig, JC
Butow, PN
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Westmead, NHMRC Ctr Clin Res Excellence Renal Med, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06576.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare attitudes of Australian physicians and paediatricians about treatment and randomised controlled trial (RCT) participation. Design and participants: A cross-sectional survey using the validated "Physician Orientation Profile" (POP), with 250 physicians and 250 paediatricians surveyed. Outcome measures: Five indices - primary allegiance, decision making under uncertainty, professional activities, perceived rewards, and peer-group influence with scores for each participant ranging along a continuum from clinician-oriented to research-oriented and expressed as a number between 0 and 1. Results: Overall response rate was 60%, with 135 physicians (54%) and 165 paediatricians (66%) responding. Paediatricians and physicians were similar in their attitudes to RCT participation, being generally clinician-oriented rather than research-oriented and less inclined to participate in RCTs when there is uncertainty about the best treatment. Most assign limited time to research, with 26.9% not currently involved in research and 31.5% having no experience of RCT participation. Doctors perceive few rewards and little peer-group influence regarding trial participation. Independent predictors of favourable attitudes to trial participation (based on POP scores) were the presence of allocated research time (0.37 for no allocated research time v 0.61 for >70% research time; P<0.0001), previous experience enrolling a patient in an RCT (0.40 for no experience v 0.46 for experience; P<0.0001), and articles published in the past 12 months (0.40 for no publications v 0.55 for >3 publications; P<0.0001). Conclusions: This study highlights the minor importance of research for most Australian physicians. Research plays only a small role in their professional activities, and the importance of research participation is not recognised. They are clinician-oriented in their attitudes to RCT participation. To encourage greater involvement in trials among physicians in Australia, clinical research needs to be restructured in a primarily clinically oriented setting with dedicated research time.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 65
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, J Natl Cancer Inst, V83, P254
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Pediatrics, V95, P286
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB SER PREP CLIN PR
[4]  
*ASS AM MED COLL, BREAK SCI BOTTL CLIN
[5]   Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study [J].
Barton, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7256) :255-256
[6]   ONCOLOGISTS RELUCTANCE TO ACCRUE PATIENTS ONTO CLINICAL-TRIALS - AN ILLINOIS CANCER CENTER STUDY [J].
BENSON, AB ;
PREGLER, JP ;
BEAN, JA ;
RADEMAKER, AW ;
ESHLER, B ;
ANDERSON, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (11) :2067-2075
[8]   Clinical trials in children [J].
Caldwell, PHY ;
Murphy, SB ;
Butow, PN ;
Craig, JC .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9436) :803-811
[9]   Pediatricians' attitudes toward randomized controlled trials involving children [J].
Caldwell, PHY ;
Butow, PN ;
Craig, JC .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2002, 141 (06) :798-803
[10]   A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-96 [J].
Campbell, H ;
Surry, SAM ;
Royle, EM .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1998, 79 (02) :192-197